Pathway land: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Hunterofsalvation (→List) |
>Hunterofsalvation No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Six Pathway lands were included in ''[[Zendikar Rising]]'' (three ally-colored and three enemy-colored cards) and not the usual cycle of five. The other four are flagged for ''[[Kaldheim]]''.<ref>{{EzTumblr|https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/628074814987517952/why-is-there-six-new-pathways-as-opposed-to-the|title=Why is there six new pathways, as opposed to the usual cycle of 5 dual lands?|September 1, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{DailyRef|making-magic/zendikar-rising-challenge-part-2-2020-09-07|''Zendikar Rising'' to the Challenge, Part 2|[[Mark Rosewater]]|September 7, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{EzTumblr|https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/628976492124258304/just-to-confirm-the-other-4-mdfc-dual-lands-are|title=Will they still be "X Pathway // Y Pathway"?|September 11, 2020}}</ref> | Six Pathway lands were included in ''[[Zendikar Rising]]'' (three ally-colored and three enemy-colored cards) and not the usual cycle of five. The other four are flagged for ''[[Kaldheim]]''.<ref>{{EzTumblr|https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/628074814987517952/why-is-there-six-new-pathways-as-opposed-to-the|title=Why is there six new pathways, as opposed to the usual cycle of 5 dual lands?|September 1, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{DailyRef|making-magic/zendikar-rising-challenge-part-2-2020-09-07|''Zendikar Rising'' to the Challenge, Part 2|[[Mark Rosewater]]|September 7, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{EzTumblr|https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/628976492124258304/just-to-confirm-the-other-4-mdfc-dual-lands-are|title=Will they still be "X Pathway // Y Pathway"?|September 11, 2020}}</ref> | ||
[[R&D]] decided that that these cards not having a [[basic land type]] (and not being a [[basic land]]) was enough to make them not “[[strictly better]]” than basic lands.<ref>{{EzTumblr|https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/632965918918656000/something-i-found-in-the-making-magic-archive-from|title="Rule #1 – No Land Can Be 'Strictly Better' Than a Basic Land".|October 25, 2020}}</ref> | |||
==List== | ==List== | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
Revision as of 06:20, 27 October 2020
Pathway lands are dual lands. They are modal double-faced cards which allow you to choose which of the two sides you want to play.[1][2]
History
Six Pathway lands were included in Zendikar Rising (three ally-colored and three enemy-colored cards) and not the usual cycle of five. The other four are flagged for Kaldheim.[3][4][5]
R&D decided that that these cards not having a basic land type (and not being a basic land) was enough to make them not “strictly better” than basic lands.[6]
List
| Set |  Front side |
 Back side
|
|---|---|---|
| Kaldheim | ... Pathway ( ) |
... Pathway ( )
|
| ZNR | Clearwater Pathway () |
Murkwater Pathway ( )
|
| Kaldheim | ... Pathway () |
... Pathway ( )
|
| ZNR | Cragcrown Pathway () |
Timbercrown Pathway ( )
|
| ZNR | Branchloft Pathway () |
Boulderloft Pathway ()
|
| ZNR | Brightclimb Pathway () |
Grimclimb Pathway ()
|
| Kaldheim | ... Pathway () |
... Pathway ()
|
| Kaldheim | ... Pathway () |
... Pathway ()
|
| ZNR | Riverglide Pathway () |
Lavaglide Pathway ()
|
| ZNR | Needleverge Pathway () |
Pillarverge Pathway ()
|
References
- ↑ The Zendikar Adventuring Party (Video). Magic: The Gathering. YouTube (September 1, 2020).
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (September 14, 2020). "Zendikar Rising Stars". magicthegathering.com. Wizards of the Coast.
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (September 1, 2020). "Why is there six new pathways, as opposed to the usual cycle of 5 dual lands?". Blogatog. Tumblr.
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (September 7, 2020). "Zendikar Rising to the Challenge, Part 2". magicthegathering.com. Wizards of the Coast.
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (September 11, 2020). "Will they still be "X Pathway // Y Pathway"?". Blogatog. Tumblr.
- ↑ Mark Rosewater (October 25, 2020). ""Rule #1 – No Land Can Be 'Strictly Better' Than a Basic Land".". Blogatog. Tumblr.
| ||||||||||||||||
