Talk:Plane Shift
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Canon status
Is there an official word on whether these documents are canon in any meaningful sense? I worry because I know that the Warcraft RPG did a lot of worldbuilding that was later proven irrelevant and non-canonical when World of Warcraft simply ignored it. --Corveroth (talk) 03:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Good question. I would treat it as canonical until proven otherwise. It is officially from Wizards and not licensed work, so in the end I see no reason to treat the information as non-canonical. - Yandere Sliver
03:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- In the absence of any official word one way or the other, I agree. Still, I've reached out to James Wyatt and Doug Beyer to see if either is willing to go on record. --Corveroth (talk) 03:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Actually I did found a potcast where he calls into question one piece of lore. Urgh... O_o - Yandere Sliver 04:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Actually I did found a potcast where he calls into question one piece of lore. Urgh... O_o - Yandere Sliver
- Since they are officially released by Wizards, I would consider the lore canonical (but not the D&D tech) --Hunter (talk) 07:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- In the absence of any official word one way or the other, I agree. Still, I've reached out to James Wyatt and Doug Beyer to see if either is willing to go on record. --Corveroth (talk) 03:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Plane Shift Innistrad Link broken
The link to plane shift innistrad is broken due to the resource not being available any more on wotc website, you can still get it for free from this link: http://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/228654/Plane-Shift-Innistrad don't know if we should add unofficial links? Fixed link by using the following link: https://media.wizards.com/2016/dnd/downloads/Plane_Shift_Innistrad.pdf (official wotc)