Talk:List of Magic sets

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Incorrect year for Challenger Decks 2020

It seems I can't edit that myself, but it became available during 2020-03, not 2019-03 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 78.192.102.219 (talk • contribs).

Fixed. Thanks. - Yandere Sliver 21:42, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Incorrect code on Battle for Zendikar

The expansion code column says “BZE”, should be “BFZ” instead. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fenhl (talk • contribs).

Fixed, thx. --Hunter (talk) 05:07, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

(block) expansion

(block) expansion hurts my eye..... Can't we just say "Nth expansion (non-block)" for the first five, and "Nth expansion"for the rest? --Hunter (talk) 16:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

I wanted to try out how it looks for consistencies sake... But I have to agree. It is cleaner without. I will remove it :P - Yandere Sliver 23:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Common vs. Rare vs. Mythic set symbols?

Is there a reason some of the set symbols are the common (black) version, while others are the rare (gold) or mythic (orange) symbol? It looks like all the symbols in Category:Magic set symbols are PNG instead of SVG. Anyone mind if I try and harmonize those a bit, and convert them to a nicer vector (SVG) format? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MidnightLightning (talk • contribs) 2016-10-28T14:54.

Hi! Most of it has to do with availability. I am not really good with svg conversion, so png was the natural choice. This is more or less the standardized version before some were jpg, gif or whatever. We have some other symbols like Energy for example which also could use a svg conversion. Perhaps you can warm yourself up with this before trying to tackle the this monstrous task. (I speak from experiance. :P) - Yandere Sliver 16:53, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
This thread might be helpful. —Fenhl 16:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Cool stuff. I will definitely take a look. - Yandere Sliver 16:57, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Missing in action

So what happened to the logo's of Commander'Arsenal and Heroes vs Monsters? Cant' find them anymore. --Hunter (talk) 05:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Fixed. Fenhl had moved the files without changing this page or leaving a redirect. --Corveroth (talk) 05:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
thx! Now something is wrong at the top (Alpha) --Hunter (talk) 07:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
The set code for Commander Anthology is CMA, not CM1. There's also a rowspan="2" in the header for the Notes column that shouldn't be there. —Fenhl 08:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
You personally argued for exactly the opposite on the talk page I linked in my previous comment. Feel free to revert the relevant edits if you've changed your mind, just make sure that any image links are updated to match. I have no stake in this article. --Corveroth (talk) 13:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Please read my comment on that talk page again. Commander's Arsenal is CM1, and Commander Anthology is CMA. And I can't edit this template since it's protected. —Fenhl 19:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
I apologize, I didn't catch that distinction. If it isn't addressed by another admin, I'll take a look at correcting all of this when I'm back at my desktop. --Corveroth (talk) 19:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Magic Online Deck Series

The Magic Online Deck Series is missing from this list. It was released on November 8, 2010, so it should be inserted between Scars of Mirrodin and Premium Deck Series: Fire & Lightning. —Fenhl 03:43, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

I will add it. Momir Basic Event Deck is missing as well I have however no clue when this was released. - Yandere Sliver 03:52, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
The article says it was released on November 22, 2010. —Fenhl 04:28, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I just edited the information in from the wikipedia. So I hope it is correct, because I could not find a primary source for that. - Yandere Sliver 04:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Duel Decks: Mirrodin Pure vs. New Phyrexia

We don't even have an article on this. Someone who knows more about it should write an article and insert it into the list. All I know is it was released on MTGO only, the set code is TD2, and these cards are in it. The watermarks should tell us which card is in which deck, though not how many copies there are. Here's the announcement post. —Fenhl 04:37, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Found an old thread on MTGS - Yandere Sliver 04:46, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Found more infos: According to MTG Goldfish's price history I would deduce that the deck was released 2013-01-11, since that is the earliest entry. Also here you can see the virtual deckbox. - Yandere Sliver 04:54, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Salvat 2005 Links to Salvat 2011

Line "| 2005-08 || Salvat 2011 || align="center"| || || Compilation set || Magic Encyclopedia set #1"

Has Salvat 2011 there instead of Salvat 2005 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 104.172.21.98 (talk • contribs).

Fixed, thank you! --Hunter (talk) 04:48, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Incorrect date for Welcome Deck 2017

Just a minor fix required ... the date for Welcome Deck 2017 is listed as "2016-04", but this should be "2017-04". --Yeurch (talk) 20:02, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

thank you very much. I totally missed that. - Yandere Sliver 21:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Unstable Fixes

So, I'm super-excited for Unstable, but unlike suggested on the latest version of the template, we don't need to wait until December 2018 ... it's coming out December of this year! Hype! Also, the official set code for Unstable is UST as detailed on the official Unstable web page. --Yeurch (talk) 20:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Incorrect date for Commander 2017

Just a minor fix required ... the date for Commander 2017 is listed as "2016-11", but this should be "2017-08". --Tuamir (talk) 19:42, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Two-letter set codes

The old two-letter set codes are still used today on Gatherer. I have found the following errors:

Also, Starter 1999's two-letter set code is P3. —Fenhl 13:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Missing ' ' for Khans of Tarkir and Dragons of Tarkir

The two sets Khans of Tarkir & Dragons of Tarkir in the table are not surrounded by ' ' properly. Looks strange in some browsers. Look in source to know what i mean:

currently: | 2015-03 || Dragons of Tarkir || align="center"| || DTK || Expansion set || 67th expansion

should be: | 2015-03 || Dragons of Tarkir || align="center"| || DTK || Expansion set || 67th expansion

An entry for Challenger Decks 2019?

We've got a page for Challenger decks 2019, and a code (Q02), but no entry in the template? Based on the first Challenger deck entry, it should be | 2019-04 || Challenger Decks 2019 || align="center" | || Q02 || Box set || Challenger Decks set #2 Link : https://mtg.gamepedia.com/Challenger_Decks_2019 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.251.28.110 (talk • contribs).

Good point. I will add it. - Yandere Sliver 01:03, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Type status of March of the Machine: The Aftermath

March of the Machine: The Aftermath is currently listed as the 97th Magic: The Gathering expansion but its looking increasingly like WotC doesn't consider it to be a premier expansion in the same way as, say, March of the Machine.[1][2] MaRo is not referring to it as a supplemental set either, probably because it's going through Standard, rather than bypassing it like most supplemental sets do. It feels at this stage like it's an event supplement to standard, which would make sense given it was originally describes as an epilogue.

Should it's classification be changed in the list, or should stay as-is until WotC confirms what they're actually going to refer to it as?

References

  1. ↑ Mark Rosewater (August 18, 2022). "March of the Machine Aftermath is a new kind of thing.". Blogatog. Tumblr.
  2. ↑ Mark Rosewater (November 08, 2022). ""What are you counting exactly?"". Blogatog. Tumblr.

-- RivalRowan (talk) 22:03, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Well, the message is clear that it shouldn't be counted as an expansion. The pages have been adjusted accordingly so we can also change it in the list. --Hunterofsalvation (talk) 06:10, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Incorrect notes on Commander Deck Sets

There was errors at notes for commander deck sets:

  • Kamigawa: Neon Dynasty Commander Decks was noted "Commander set #13" when it was supposed to be "Commander Decks set #7".
  • Streets of New Capenna Commander Decks was noted "Commander Decks set #7" when it was supposed to be "Commander Decks set #8".
  • Commander Legends: Battle for Baldur's Gate Commander Decks was noted "Commander Decks set #8" when it was supposed to be "Commander Decks set #9", and so on...

Also, does Starter Commander Decks counted as Commander Decks Set? Since that product was only reprints, I think maybe it should get different notes, such as Starter Set or Starter Commander to differentiate it from other Commander product.

Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Al24PSI (talk • contribs) March 1, 2024‎.

Oof, that's a mess. Thanks for letting us know. I've fixed this so the order should match the release schedule. -- RivalRowan (talk) 23:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Regarding notes on Commander Sets

There was an error at notes for Commander set:

  • Commander 2018 and Commander 2019 were both noted as "Commander set #10" when it was supposed to be "Commander set #10" and "Commander set #11" respectively.
  • Commander 2020 were noted as "Commander set #11" when it was supposed to be "Commander set #12".
  • And lastly Commander 2021 were noted as "Commander set #12" when it was supposed to be "Commander set #13". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Al24PSI (talk • contribs) March 1, 2024‎.
Good pick up! Thanks for letting us know. I've fixed this up now. -- RivalRowan (talk) 23:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://mtg.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Magic_sets&oldid=515002"