Talk:Key

Unnecessary?

I have the same issue with this page I do with individualized pages for counters that are only used once, which I explained on Talk:Counter (marker)/Full List. It seems like this information is just duplicating information from a single card (essentially giving that card its own page, which is not usually the policy unless the card is truly noteworthy somehow), and which is also summarized already in the "Key" section on the types page. The fact it's a mystery booster card makes it even more extraneous - that set intentionally made up some weirdo one-off design choices, and while it makes sense to discuss them, they don't all need standalone pages to describe them. - jerodast (talk) 18:49, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Noting the comparison to the Cloud type also from one test card, the fact that Cloud is a basic land type would have some big rules implications that make it noteworthy, whereas Key is...just some artifact subtype. With that said - there aren't that many artifact subtypes, so maybe the fact they did Key is inherently noteworthy. I might be turning around on this one :) Still not on the counters though. - jerodast (talk) 19:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)