Talk:Emblem

Infobox image

We're currently using the Mordenkainen Emblem (Adventures in the Forgotten Realms) as the infobox image. It's accurate, but it also represents a non-Magic character and R&D (or at least Mark) believes the D&D planeswalkers were a mistake. Any objections to changing it to the Vivien Reid Emblem (Magic: The Gathering Foundations)? -- RivalRowan (talk) 22:40, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Sound reasoning and a good example emblem. Go for it! Corveroth (talk) 00:49, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Fine by me --Hunter (talk) 07:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

The Mordenkainen one is interesting because it has the name in the typeline. But the foundation one skips that again. So this seems to be an overall case of the D&D Emblems being special. But I agree, it should be the most current frame used for Emblems, which seems to be the post-Core Set 2020 one. - Yandere-sliver (talk) 07:25, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

That's an interesting note. Which other emblems have fake "reminder text" types like that? If it's widespread, that might earn a note on this page. If it was just that one set, put it there. Corveroth (talk) 07:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Perusing Scryfall gives Wrenn and Six's MH1 printing as the most recent in its set, with Arlinn, Embraced by the Moon's List printing the most recent overall. Shield (talk) 10:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

It's already in the text ... --Hunter (talk) 10:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks Yandere-sliver for updating the infobox image! -- RivalRowan (talk) 02:55, 13 May 2025 (UTC)