Talk:Chronicles
The reference link does not go to the correct article, I don't know how to fix. --GeoMike 12:17, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Hmmm... Here is the correct site. Did they do some changes in numbers of urls of sites while changing mtg.com to a new look? --MORT (T) 13:05, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- Makes me wonder how many of our templates direct to wrong pages on mtg.com now. --GeoMike 14:02, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Japanese Chronicles was
The two following quotes from different sections of the page convey that Japanese Chronicles cards had white borders.
Each card was white-bordered, while the cards in their original sets were black-bordered.
The set was printed in English and Japanese only. A similar, yet black-bordered set called Renaissance was released into German, French, and Italian markets.
All Japanese Chronicles cards actually have black borders, similarly to Rinascimento, as it was the first time those cards were printed in the language. Furthermore, there was no white-bordered print run.
Sources (Japanese):
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 110.54.122.241 (talk • contribs).
Set symbol
I'm quite confused about the origin of the set ("expansion") symbol - - and would love if anyone could clarify. The text and my experience is clear that Chronicles re-used past expansion symbols. Where did its symbol listed in the infobox come from? Is it listed or printed anywhere official? Would also like to clarify this on List of Magic sets which says "Expansion symbol from original printing" which I now realize is referring to each card's expansion symbol, but appearing right next to the table entry, it sounds like it's saying "the Chronicles expansion symbol with a C in it is the one used from the original printing"... - jerodast (talk) 01:18, 16 August 2025 (UTC)