Talk:Creature class: Difference between revisions
>The Squirle master No edit summary |
>LegacymtgsalvationUser8147 No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I've altered the page to make it more inclusive because I thought that if we have a page on wizards, we'd have to have one for every other type of spellcaster too and individual pages seemed weird. [[User:Randel|Randel]] 06:48, 27 May 2006 (CDT) | I've altered the page to make it more inclusive because I thought that if we have a page on wizards, we'd have to have one for every other type of spellcaster too and individual pages seemed weird. [[User:Randel|Randel]] 06:48, 27 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
Shouldn't be here also planeswalkers now? [[User:MORT|MORT]] 11:26, 27 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:26, 27 May 2006
This is not an affiliation. If it were a specific group of wizards, that'd be different. I'd suggest a 'character class' page but that sounds too much like D&D. Either way, I don't think this belongs in affiliations. Randel 23:43, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
I agree. "Characters," maybe? It isn't about a specific character, but it is about a class of characters. VestDan 23:48, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
What about "profession"? Oracle of Truth 08:52, 26 May 2006 (CDT)
I've altered the page to make it more inclusive because I thought that if we have a page on wizards, we'd have to have one for every other type of spellcaster too and individual pages seemed weird. Randel 06:48, 27 May 2006 (CDT)
Shouldn't be here also planeswalkers now? MORT 11:26, 27 May 2006 (CDT)