Talk:Creature class: Difference between revisions
im>Randel No edit summary |
>The Squirle master No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I've altered the page to make it more inclusive because I thought that if we have a page on wizards, we'd have to have one for every other type of spellcaster too and individual pages seemed weird. [[User:Randel|Randel]] 06:48, 27 May 2006 (CDT) | I've altered the page to make it more inclusive because I thought that if we have a page on wizards, we'd have to have one for every other type of spellcaster too and individual pages seemed weird. [[User:Randel|Randel]] 06:48, 27 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
I like this change. But where did you get the info that Spellshaper = Rhystic Mage. I though they where two different kind of mages. [[User:The Squirle master|The Squirle master]] 08:25, 27 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:25, 27 May 2006
This is not an affiliation. If it were a specific group of wizards, that'd be different. I'd suggest a 'character class' page but that sounds too much like D&D. Either way, I don't think this belongs in affiliations. Randel 23:43, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
I agree. "Characters," maybe? It isn't about a specific character, but it is about a class of characters. VestDan 23:48, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
What about "profession"? Oracle of Truth 08:52, 26 May 2006 (CDT)
I've altered the page to make it more inclusive because I thought that if we have a page on wizards, we'd have to have one for every other type of spellcaster too and individual pages seemed weird. Randel 06:48, 27 May 2006 (CDT)
I like this change. But where did you get the info that Spellshaper = Rhystic Mage. I though they where two different kind of mages. The Squirle master 08:25, 27 May 2006 (CDT)