Talk:Creature class: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
im>Randel
mNo edit summary
im>VestDan
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This is not an affiliation.  If it were a specific group of wizards, that'd be different.  I'd suggest a 'character class' page but that sounds too much like D&D.  Either way, I don't think this belongs in affiliations.  [[User:Randel|Randel]] 23:43, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
This is not an affiliation.  If it were a specific group of wizards, that'd be different.  I'd suggest a 'character class' page but that sounds too much like D&D.  Either way, I don't think this belongs in affiliations.  [[User:Randel|Randel]] 23:43, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
I agree. "Characters," maybe? It isn't about a specific character, but it is about a class of characters. [[User:VestDan|VestDan]] 23:48, 25 May 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 04:48, 26 May 2006

This is not an affiliation. If it were a specific group of wizards, that'd be different. I'd suggest a 'character class' page but that sounds too much like D&D. Either way, I don't think this belongs in affiliations. Randel 23:43, 25 May 2006 (CDT)

I agree. "Characters," maybe? It isn't about a specific character, but it is about a class of characters. VestDan 23:48, 25 May 2006 (CDT)