Talk:Creature class: Difference between revisions
im>VestDan No edit summary |
>The Squirle master No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Added Planeswalker and defined Task mage, but remove definition from Spellshaper, as the spellshaper mechanic and the rhystic mechanic were never in any way affiliated. [[User:VestDan|VestDan]] 11:59, 27 May 2006 (CDT) | Added Planeswalker and defined Task mage, but remove definition from Spellshaper, as the spellshaper mechanic and the rhystic mechanic were never in any way affiliated. [[User:VestDan|VestDan]] 11:59, 27 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
I suggest putting Lawmages and Chronarchs as subsections of Wizards, since they're realy just wizards focussing on a specific kind of spells. [[User:The Squirle master|The Squirle master]] 12:05, 27 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:05, 27 May 2006
This is not an affiliation. If it were a specific group of wizards, that'd be different. I'd suggest a 'character class' page but that sounds too much like D&D. Either way, I don't think this belongs in affiliations. Randel 23:43, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
I agree. "Characters," maybe? It isn't about a specific character, but it is about a class of characters. VestDan 23:48, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
What about "profession"? Oracle of Truth 08:52, 26 May 2006 (CDT)
I've altered the page to make it more inclusive because I thought that if we have a page on wizards, we'd have to have one for every other type of spellcaster too and individual pages seemed weird. Randel 06:48, 27 May 2006 (CDT)
Shouldn't be here also planeswalkers now? MORT 11:26, 27 May 2006 (CDT)
Added Planeswalker and defined Task mage, but remove definition from Spellshaper, as the spellshaper mechanic and the rhystic mechanic were never in any way affiliated. VestDan 11:59, 27 May 2006 (CDT)
I suggest putting Lawmages and Chronarchs as subsections of Wizards, since they're realy just wizards focussing on a specific kind of spells. The Squirle master 12:05, 27 May 2006 (CDT)