Strictly better: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(added, Dragon Mantle)
>Corveroth
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TOCright}}
{{TOCright}}
'''Strictly better''' is a term used to compare cards that are identical in most regards, and in each way they are different the same one is more favorable.<ref>{{DailyRef|mtgcom/daily/mr65|This Land is My Land|[[Mark Rosewater]]|March 31, 2003}}</ref> ''Strictly better'' does not care about creature type.<ref>{{TumblrRef|author=[[Mark Rosewater]]|URL=http://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/92389242218/does-the-term-strictly-better-care-about-creature|title=Does the term "strictly better" care about creature types?|tumblr-title=Blogatog|date=July 20, 2014}}</ref> For example, <c>Lightning Bolt</c> is strictly better than <c>Shock</c>. Both are [[instants]] that cost {{r}} and deal damage to a creature or player, but Lightning Bolt deals 3 damage where shock deals 2 damage. The opposite of ''strictly better'' is called ''strictly worse'', as in "Shock is strictly worse than Lightning Bolt."
[[Strictly better]] describes a card which is, in isolation from other effects, superior to another card in at least one respect, while being worse in zero respects.<ref>{{DailyRef|mtgcom/daily/mr65|This Land is My Land|[[Mark Rosewater]]|March 31, 2003}}</ref> Cards are commonly found to be strictly better than others by virtue of lower cost, larger effect, [[instant]] speed, greater power or toughness, or more versatile or added effects.


The convention is well understood among experienced ''Magic'' players. However, those new to the terminology may complain that a strictly better card is not better in all situations than a strictly worse card.<ref>{{DailyRef|mtg/daily/lo/289|Strictly Superior|[[Mike Flores]]|March 03, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{DailyRef|mtg/daily/lo/290|Redundancy|[[Mike Flores]]|March 10, 2014}}</ref> For example, <c>Shock</c> is a better card to draw than <c>Lightning Bolt</c> if the opponent controls a <c>Booby Trap</c> naming Lightning Bolt. Such examples are not a failure of the terminology; it compares only the attributes of the cards regardless of obscure situations that may arise in play.
<!--
This paragraph uses quotation marks around "strictly better" because it discusses the fact that the term is not literally true in most cases. After this paragraph, return to using it without quotes, as it is now explained and defined.
-->
"Strictly better" status is not dependent on creature type or color.<ref>{{TumblrRef|author=[[Mark Rosewater]]|URL=http://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/92389242218/does-the-term-strictly-better-care-about-creature|title=Does the term "strictly better" care about creature types?|tumblr-title=Blogatog|date=July 20, 2014}}</ref> More generally, such comparisons between cards are made independent of any particular [[board state]]. Therefore, because of the sheer number of possible gameplay circumstances, for any given "strictly better" card, there is typically some imaginable set of circumstances in which it is, in fact, inferior to another card that would otherwise rank below it. This fact implies that a "strictly better" card might be more accurately termed "typically better", and that distinction sometimes confuses newer players.<ref>{{DailyRef|mtg/daily/lo/289|Strictly Superior|[[Mike Flores]]|March 03, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{DailyRef|mtg/daily/lo/290|Redundancy|[[Mike Flores]]|March 10, 2014}}</ref> However, "strictly better" is well understood among experienced ''Magic'' players, and is the prevailing description of such a relationship between cards.


Cards are constantly being obsoleted by strictly better versions (sometimes even in the same set, such as <c>Glory Seeker</c> and <c>Knight of Cliffhaven</c>). This may lead to [[power creep]]. Examples of strict comparisons include:
For example, <c>Lightning Bolt</c> is strictly better than <c>Shock</c>. Both are [[instants]], both cost {{r}}, and both can target either a creature or a player, but Lightning Bolt deals 3 damage, whereas Shock deals only 2 damage.


The printing of a new strictly better card may make comparable cards obsolete, and this process, left unchecked, leads to [[power creep]]. Occasionally, this may occur with directly comparable cards printed in the same set, such as <c>Glory Seeker</c> and <c>Knight of Cliffhaven</c> in ''[[Rise of the Eldrazi]]''.
=Examples=
==More powerful at same cost==
==More powerful at same cost==
The following cards have the same cost but one has an added ability or greater size.
The following cards have the same cost, but one has an added ability or greater size.
*<c>Alloy Myr</c> is strictly better than <c>Opaline Unicorn</c> because it has greater power.
*<c>Alloy Myr</c> is strictly better than <c>Opaline Unicorn</c> because it has greater power.
*<c>Armored Griffin</c> is strictly better than <c>Abbey Griffin</c> because it has greater toughness.
*<c>Armored Griffin</c> is strictly better than <c>Abbey Griffin</c> because it has greater toughness.
Line 31: Line 37:


==Same effect but cost less==
==Same effect but cost less==
The following cards have the same effect but one has a greater cost.
The following cards have the same effect, but one has a greater cost.
*<c>Control Magic</c> is strictly better than <c>Mind Control</c>.
*<c>Control Magic</c> is strictly better than <c>Mind Control</c>.
*<c>Dead Weight</c> is strictly better than <c>Enfeeblement</c> and <c>Weakness</c>.
*<c>Dead Weight</c> is strictly better than <c>Enfeeblement</c> and <c>Weakness</c>.
Line 39: Line 45:


==Instant instead of sorcery==
==Instant instead of sorcery==
The following are cards that have the same effect and cost but are instants instead of [[sorcery|sorceries]].
The following are cards that have the same effect and cost, but are instants instead of [[sorcery|sorceries]].
*<c>Boil</c> is strictly better than <c>Boiling Seas</c>.
*<c>Boil</c> is strictly better than <c>Boiling Seas</c>.
*<c>Howl from Beyond</c> is strictly better than <c>Bloodcurdling Scream</c>.
*<c>Howl from Beyond</c> is strictly better than <c>Bloodcurdling Scream</c>.


==Multiple upgrades==
==Multiple upgrades==
Some cards can be compared strictly in more than one way.  If one card is better than another in every way that they're different, then the comparison is strict.
Some cards may be strictly better in multiple respects, but are only strictly better ''overall'' if they have no attributes inferior to the card they are compared with.
*<c>Back to Nature</c> is strictly better than <c>Tranquility</c> because the former costs {{1}} less and is an instant instead of a sorcery.
*<c>Back to Nature</c> is strictly better than <c>Tranquility</c> because the former costs {{1}} less and is an instant instead of a sorcery.
*<c>Vulshok Battlegear</c> is strictly better than <c>Warlord's Axe</c> because the former costs less to equip and gives a larger toughness bonus.
*<c>Vulshok Battlegear</c> is strictly better than <c>Warlord's Axe</c> because the former costs less to equip and gives a larger toughness bonus.
Line 53: Line 59:
*<c>Dragon Mantle</c> is strictly better than <c>Firebreathing</c> because it also draws you a card.
*<c>Dragon Mantle</c> is strictly better than <c>Firebreathing</c> because it also draws you a card.


==References==
=References=
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}


[[Category:Magic slang]]
[[Category:Magic slang]]

Revision as of 21:40, 16 September 2015

Strictly better describes a card which is, in isolation from other effects, superior to another card in at least one respect, while being worse in zero respects.[1] Cards are commonly found to be strictly better than others by virtue of lower cost, larger effect, instant speed, greater power or toughness, or more versatile or added effects.

"Strictly better" status is not dependent on creature type or color.[2] More generally, such comparisons between cards are made independent of any particular board state. Therefore, because of the sheer number of possible gameplay circumstances, for any given "strictly better" card, there is typically some imaginable set of circumstances in which it is, in fact, inferior to another card that would otherwise rank below it. This fact implies that a "strictly better" card might be more accurately termed "typically better", and that distinction sometimes confuses newer players.[3][4] However, "strictly better" is well understood among experienced Magic players, and is the prevailing description of such a relationship between cards.

For example, Lightning Bolt is strictly better than Shock. Both are instants, both cost {R}, and both can target either a creature or a player, but Lightning Bolt deals 3 damage, whereas Shock deals only 2 damage.

The printing of a new strictly better card may make comparable cards obsolete, and this process, left unchecked, leads to power creep. Occasionally, this may occur with directly comparable cards printed in the same set, such as Glory Seeker and Knight of Cliffhaven in Rise of the Eldrazi.

Examples

More powerful at same cost

The following cards have the same cost, but one has an added ability or greater size.

More flexibility at same cost

The following cards have the same effect, but one is more restricted in its use.

Same effect but cost less

The following cards have the same effect, but one has a greater cost.

Instant instead of sorcery

The following are cards that have the same effect and cost, but are instants instead of sorceries.

Multiple upgrades

Some cards may be strictly better in multiple respects, but are only strictly better overall if they have no attributes inferior to the card they are compared with.

References

  1. Mark Rosewater (March 31, 2003). "This Land is My Land". magicthegathering.com. Wizards of the Coast.
  2. Error on call to {{WebRef}}: Parameters url and title must be specifiedMark Rosewater (July 20, 2014). "". Tumblr.
  3. Mike Flores (March 03, 2014). "Strictly Superior". magicthegathering.com. Wizards of the Coast.
  4. Mike Flores (March 10, 2014). "Redundancy". magicthegathering.com. Wizards of the Coast.