Strictly better: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
>DimirPickpocket324
mNo edit summary
>Jerodast
m (set-specific card links, given the context)
 
(37 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TOCright}}
'''Strictly better''' describes a card which is, in isolation from other effects, superior to another card in at least one respect, while being worse in zero respects.<ref>{{DailyRef|making-magic/land-my-land-2003-03-31|This Land is My Land|[[Mark Rosewater]]|March 31, 2003}}</ref><ref name="Even More R&D">{{DailyRef|making-magic/even-more-words-rd-2022-01-10|Even More Words From R&D|[[Mark Rosewater]]|January 10, 2022}}</ref>  Cards are commonly found to be strictly better than others by virtue of lower cost, larger effect, [[instant]] speed, greater power or toughness, or more versatile or added effects.
[[Strictly better]] describes a card which is, in isolation from other effects, superior to another card in at least one respect, while being worse in zero respects.<ref>{{DailyRef|mtgcom/daily/mr65|This Land is My Land|[[Mark Rosewater]]|March 31, 2003}}</ref> Cards are commonly found to be strictly better than others by virtue of lower cost, larger effect, [[instant]] speed, greater power or toughness, or more versatile or added effects.


==Description==
<!--
<!--
This paragraph uses quotation marks around "strictly better" because it discusses the fact that the term is not literally true in most cases. After this paragraph, return to using it without quotes, as it is now explained and defined.
This paragraph uses quotation marks around "strictly better" because it discusses the fact that the term is not literally true in most cases. After this paragraph, return to using it without quotes, as it is now explained and defined.
-->
-->
"Strictly better" status is not dependent on creature type or color.<ref>{{TumblrRef|author=[[Mark Rosewater]]|URL=http://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/92389242218/does-the-term-strictly-better-care-about-creature|title=Does the term "strictly better" care about creature types?|tumblr-title=Blogatog|date=July 20, 2014}}</ref> More generally, such comparisons between cards are made independent of any particular [[board state]]. Therefore, because of the sheer number of possible gameplay circumstances, for any given "strictly better" card, there is typically some imaginable set of circumstances in which it is, in fact, inferior to another card that would otherwise rank below it. This fact implies that a "strictly better" card might be more accurately termed "typically better", and that distinction sometimes confuses newer players.<ref>{{DailyRef|mtg/daily/lo/289|Strictly Superior|[[Mike Flores]]|March 03, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{DailyRef|mtg/daily/lo/290|Redundancy|[[Mike Flores]]|March 10, 2014}}</ref> However, "strictly better" is well understood among experienced ''Magic'' players, and is the prevailing description of such a relationship between cards.
"Strictly better" status is not dependent on creature type.<ref>{{EzTumblr|http://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/92389242218/does-the-term-strictly-better-care-about-creature|title=Does the term "strictly better" care about creature types?|July 20, 2014}}</ref> More generally, such comparisons between cards are made independent of any particular [[board state]].<ref>{{EzTumblr|http://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/165100934838/can-you-please-give-us-a-definition-of-the-term|title=Can you please give us a definition of the term "Strictly Better"?|September 07, 2017}}</ref> Therefore, because of the sheer number of possible gameplay circumstances, for any given "strictly better" card, there is typically some imaginable set of circumstances in which it is, in fact, inferior to another card that would otherwise rank below it. This fact implies that a "strictly better" card might be more accurately termed "typically better", and that distinction sometimes confuses newer players.<ref>{{DailyRef|making-magic/strictly-superior-2014-03-03|Strictly Superior|[[Mike Flores]]|March 03, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{DailyRef|making-magic/redundancy-2014-03-10|Redundancy|[[Mike Flores]]|March 10, 2014}}</ref> However, "strictly better" is well understood among experienced ''Magic'' players, and is the prevailing description of such a relationship between cards.  


For example, <c>Lightning Bolt</c> is strictly better than <c>Shock</c>. Both are [[instants]], both cost {{r}}, and both can target either a creature or a player, but Lightning Bolt deals 3 damage, whereas Shock deals only 2 damage.
For example, <c>Lightning Bolt</c> is strictly better than <c>Shock</c>. Both are [[instant]]s, both cost {{R}}, and both can target either a creature or a player, but Lightning Bolt deals 3 damage, whereas Shock deals only 2 damage.<ref>{{DailyRef|latest-developments/strictly-better-2016-11-04|Strictly Better|[[Sam Stoddard]]|November 4, 2016}}</ref> Although Shock would be preferable to Lightning Bolt if, for example, your opponent controls a <c>Mogg Maniac</c> that you need to kill while you have 3 life, this doesn't preclude Lightning Bolt from being "strictly better," as said circumstances are incredibly niche. How broad these circumstances are is generally the most contentious aspect of the term; a general rule of thumb is that no other card or mechanic in the context should be named, making the use case as generic as possible.
Things usually discounted:
* Card-specific abilities - any scenario that requires a specific card interaction in order to disprove strictly better is moot.
* Target redirection spells and control-changing effects are too rare and specifically are powerful because they reverse situations.
* Effects that specifically call out higher numerical values beneficially or lower numerical values negatively, which falls under "unusual".
* Creature type should only be counted as neutral. Creature types in the rules text should make any two cards largely incomparable. Artifacts and enchantments with identical abilities also should not be compared. Colors or types of tokens created should also not matter.
* [[Devotion]] and [[chroma]], which would make denser color symbols marginally better despite being a hinderance otherwise.
* [[Color identity]] in regard to the Commander color identity rules should not affect if a better card has a multicolor ability, but different colors are incomparable.


Many pairs of cards are not directly comparable, and thus cannot be termed strictly better or worse. For example, <c>Reprisal</c> and <c>Vanquish the Foul</c> have similar effects, but the latter half of each effect cannot be compared to the other card. Despite <c>Reprisal</c>'s lower cost and faster speed, it cannot be termed strictly better than <c>Vanquish the Foul</c>. However, <c>Reprisal</c> ''is'' strictly better than <c>Smite the Monstrous</c>, because it has a lower cost and prevents regeneration, while being worse in no respect.
Many pairs of cards are not directly comparable, and thus cannot be termed strictly better or worse. For example, <c>Reprisal</c> and <c>Vanquish the Foul</c> have similar effects, but the latter half of each effect cannot be compared to the other card. Despite <c>Reprisal</c>'s lower cost and faster speed, it cannot be termed strictly better than <c>Vanquish the Foul</c>. However, <c>Reprisal</c> ''is'' strictly better than <c>Smite the Monstrous</c>, because it has a lower cost and prevents regeneration while being worse in no respect. The fact that something like {{Card|Spell Snare}} counters <c>Reprisal</c> but not <c>Smite the Monstrous</c> is not a valid consideration.


The printing of a new strictly better card may make comparable cards obsolete, and this process, left unchecked, leads to [[power creep]]. Occasionally, this may occur with directly comparable cards printed in the same set, such as <c>Glory Seeker</c> and <c>Knight of Cliffhaven</c> in ''[[Rise of the Eldrazi]]''.
The printing of a new strictly better card may make comparable cards obsolete, and this process left unchecked leads to [[power creep]]. As rarity has no factor on the definition of strictly better, this occurs relatively frequently with directly comparable cards printed in the same set. Less often, two commons such as {{card|Glory Seeker||ROE}} and {{card|Knight of Cliffhaven||ROE}} in ''[[Rise of the Eldrazi]]'' will have this relationship. This phenomenon of strictly better cards within the same set goes all the way back to ''[[Alpha]]'' (e.g., {{card|Gray Ogre||LEA}} and {{card|Sedge Troll||LEA}}).


=Examples=
==Examples==
==More powerful at same cost==
===More powerful at same cost===
The following cards have the same cost, but one has an added ability or greater size.
The following cards have the same cost, but one has an added ability or greater size.
*<c>Alloy Myr</c> is strictly better than <c>Opaline Unicorn</c> because it has greater power.
*<c>Alloy Myr</c> is strictly better than <c>Opaline Unicorn</c> because it has greater power.
*<c>Armored Griffin</c> is strictly better than <c>Abbey Griffin</c> because it has greater toughness.
*<c>Armored Griffin</c> is strictly better than <c>Abbey Griffin</c> because it has greater toughness.
*<c>Ashcoat Bear</c> is strictly better than <c>Grizzly Bears</c> (and its [[functional reprint]]s) because it also has [[flash]].
*<c>Ashcoat Bear</c> is strictly better than <c>Grizzly Bears</c> (and its [[functional reprint]]s) because it also has [[flash]].
*<c>Deviant Glee</c> is strictly better than <c>Unholy Strength</c> as it also can grant activateable [[trample]].
*<c>Hovermyr</c> is strictly better than <c>Omega Myr</c> because it also has [[flying]] and [[vigilance]].
*<c>Elite Vanguard</c> is strictly better than <c>Eager Cadet</c> because it has a greater power.
*<c>Deviant Glee</c> is strictly better than <c>Unholy Strength</c> as it also can grant [[trample]] as an activated ability.
*<c>Ethereal Armor</c> is strictly better than <c>Lance</c> because it also grants a minimum of +1/+1.
*<c>Giant Crab</c> is strictly better than <c>Homarid Warrior</c> as it doesn't tap to use its ability.
*<c>Giant Crab</c> is strictly better than <c>Homarid Warrior</c> as it doesn't tap to use its ability.
*<c>Hovermyr</c> is strictly better than <c>Omega Myr</c> because it has the added ability of [[flying]] and [[vigilance]].
*<c>Lagonna-Band Trailblazer</c> is strictly better than <c>Yoked Ox</c> because it has an added "Heroic" ability.
*<c>Makindi Griffin</c> is strictly better than <c>Spotted Griffin</c> because it has greater toughness.
*<c>Hunted Witness</c> is strictly better than <c>Garrison Cat</c> because the token created has lifelink.
*<c>Sejiri Refuge</c> is strictly better than <c>Coastal Tower</c> because it gains life.
*<c>Sejiri Refuge</c> is strictly better than <c>Coastal Tower</c> because it gains life.
*<c>Sporecap Spider</c> is strictly better than <c>Rib Cage Spider</c> because it has greater toughness.
*<c>Owlbear</c> is strictly better than <c>Fangren Hunter</c> because it draws a card when it enters.
*<c>Wall of Vines</c> is strictly better than <c>Wall of Wood</c> because it also has [[reach]].
*<c>Divine Arrow</c> is strictly better than <c>Impeccable Timing</c> because it deals an additional damage.
*<c>Yavimaya Wurm</c> is strictly better than <c>Craw Wurm</c> because it has trample.
*<c>Ethereal Armor</c> is strictly better than <c>Lance</c> because it also grants a minimum of +1/+1.
*<c>Lagonna-Band Trailblazer</c> is strictly better than <c>Yoked Ox</c> because it has an added "Heroic" ability.
*<c>Dead Weight</c> is strictly better than <c>Weakness</c> because it removes an extra toughness from its target.
*<c>Artificer's Epiphany</c> is strictly better than <c>Catalog</c> because there is a chance not to discard a card.


==More [[flexibility]] at same cost==
===More [[flexibility]] at same cost===
The following cards have the same effect, but one is more restricted in its use.
The following cards have the same effect, but one is more restricted in its use.
*<c>Coordinated Assault</c> is strictly better than <c>Kindled Fury</c>, because it can target an additional creature.
*<c>Coordinated Assault</c> is strictly better than <c>Kindled Fury</c>, because it can target an additional creature.
Line 37: Line 44:
*<c>Jungle Shrine</c> is strictly better than <c>Shivan Oasis</c>, because it can provide an additional color of mana.
*<c>Jungle Shrine</c> is strictly better than <c>Shivan Oasis</c>, because it can provide an additional color of mana.
*<c>Negate</c> is strictly better than <c>Flash Counter</c>, because it can counter additional types of spells.
*<c>Negate</c> is strictly better than <c>Flash Counter</c>, because it can counter additional types of spells.
*<c>Obliterating Bolt</c> is strictly better than <c>Lava Coil</c> because it can also target planeswalkers.


==Same effect but cost less==
===Same effect but cost less===
The following cards have the same effect, but one has a greater cost.
The following cards have the same effect, but one has a greater cost.
*<c>Control Magic</c> is strictly better than <c>Mind Control</c>.
*<c>Control Magic</c> is strictly better than <c>Mind Control</c>.
*<c>Dead Weight</c> is strictly better than <c>Enfeeblement</c> and <c>Weakness</c>.
*<c>Dead Weight</c> is strictly better than <c>Enfeeblement</c> and <c>Debilitating Injury</c>.
*<c>Elvish Archers</c> is strictly better than <c>Hornet Cobra</c>.
*<c>Elvish Archers</c> is strictly better than <c>Hornet Cobra</c>.
*<c>Goblin Tunneler</c> is strictly better than <c>Dwarven Nomad</c>.
*<c>Goblin Tunneler</c> is strictly better than <c>Dwarven Nomad</c>.
*<c>Lightning Bolt</c> is strictly better than <c>Shard Volley</c>.
*<c>Lightning Bolt</c> is strictly better than <c>Shard Volley</c>.


==Instant instead of sorcery==
===Instant instead of sorcery===
The following are cards that have the same effect and cost, but are instants instead of [[sorcery|sorceries]].
The following are cards that have the same effect and cost but are instants instead of [[sorcery|sorceries]].
*<c>Boil</c> is strictly better than <c>Boiling Seas</c>.
*<c>Boil</c> is strictly better than <c>Boiling Seas</c>.
*<c>Howl from Beyond</c> is strictly better than <c>Bloodcurdling Scream</c>.
*<c>Howl from Beyond</c> is strictly better than <c>Bloodcurdling Scream</c>.
*<c>Inner Struggle</c> is strictly better than <c>Wrack with Madness</c>.


==Multiple upgrades==
===Multiple upgrades===
Some cards may be strictly better in multiple respects, but are only strictly better ''overall'' if they have no attributes inferior to the card they are compared with.
Some cards may be strictly better in multiple respects but are only strictly better ''overall'' if they have no attributes inferior to the card they are compared with.
*<c>Back to Nature</c> is strictly better than <c>Tranquility</c> because the former costs {{1}} less and is an instant instead of a sorcery.
*<c>Back to Nature</c> is strictly better than <c>Tranquility</c> because the former costs {{1}} less and is an instant instead of a sorcery.
*<c>Vulshok Battlegear</c> is strictly better than <c>Warlord's Axe</c> because the former costs less to equip and gives a larger toughness bonus.
*<c>Vulshok Battlegear</c> is strictly better than <c>Warlord's Axe</c> because the former costs less to equip and gives a larger toughness bonus.
Line 60: Line 69:
*<c>Reprisal</c> is strictly better than <c>Smite the Monstrous</c> because the former prevents regeneration and has a lower mana cost.
*<c>Reprisal</c> is strictly better than <c>Smite the Monstrous</c> because the former prevents regeneration and has a lower mana cost.
*<c>Dragon Mantle</c> is strictly better than <c>Firebreathing</c> because it also draws you a card.
*<c>Dragon Mantle</c> is strictly better than <c>Firebreathing</c> because it also draws you a card.
*<c>Strength of the Tajuru</c> is strictly better than <c>Stand Together</c> as they are identical when <c>Strength of the Tajuru</c> is kicked once and X=2, but Strength can also be cast for other configurations.


=References=
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}


[[Category:Magic slang]]
[[Category:Magic slang]]

Latest revision as of 08:37, 21 February 2023

Strictly better describes a card which is, in isolation from other effects, superior to another card in at least one respect, while being worse in zero respects.[1][2] Cards are commonly found to be strictly better than others by virtue of lower cost, larger effect, instant speed, greater power or toughness, or more versatile or added effects.

Description

"Strictly better" status is not dependent on creature type.[3] More generally, such comparisons between cards are made independent of any particular board state.[4] Therefore, because of the sheer number of possible gameplay circumstances, for any given "strictly better" card, there is typically some imaginable set of circumstances in which it is, in fact, inferior to another card that would otherwise rank below it. This fact implies that a "strictly better" card might be more accurately termed "typically better", and that distinction sometimes confuses newer players.[5][6] However, "strictly better" is well understood among experienced Magic players, and is the prevailing description of such a relationship between cards.

For example, Lightning Bolt is strictly better than Shock. Both are instants, both cost {R}, and both can target either a creature or a player, but Lightning Bolt deals 3 damage, whereas Shock deals only 2 damage.[7] Although Shock would be preferable to Lightning Bolt if, for example, your opponent controls a Mogg Maniac that you need to kill while you have 3 life, this doesn't preclude Lightning Bolt from being "strictly better," as said circumstances are incredibly niche. How broad these circumstances are is generally the most contentious aspect of the term; a general rule of thumb is that no other card or mechanic in the context should be named, making the use case as generic as possible. Things usually discounted:

  • Card-specific abilities - any scenario that requires a specific card interaction in order to disprove strictly better is moot.
  • Target redirection spells and control-changing effects are too rare and specifically are powerful because they reverse situations.
  • Effects that specifically call out higher numerical values beneficially or lower numerical values negatively, which falls under "unusual".
  • Creature type should only be counted as neutral. Creature types in the rules text should make any two cards largely incomparable. Artifacts and enchantments with identical abilities also should not be compared. Colors or types of tokens created should also not matter.
  • Devotion and chroma, which would make denser color symbols marginally better despite being a hinderance otherwise.
  • Color identity in regard to the Commander color identity rules should not affect if a better card has a multicolor ability, but different colors are incomparable.

Many pairs of cards are not directly comparable, and thus cannot be termed strictly better or worse. For example, Reprisal and Vanquish the Foul have similar effects, but the latter half of each effect cannot be compared to the other card. Despite Reprisal's lower cost and faster speed, it cannot be termed strictly better than Vanquish the Foul. However, Reprisal is strictly better than Smite the Monstrous, because it has a lower cost and prevents regeneration while being worse in no respect. The fact that something like Spell Snare counters Reprisal but not Smite the Monstrous is not a valid consideration.

The printing of a new strictly better card may make comparable cards obsolete, and this process left unchecked leads to power creep. As rarity has no factor on the definition of strictly better, this occurs relatively frequently with directly comparable cards printed in the same set. Less often, two commons such as Glory Seeker and Knight of Cliffhaven in Rise of the Eldrazi will have this relationship. This phenomenon of strictly better cards within the same set goes all the way back to Alpha (e.g., Gray Ogre and Sedge Troll).

Examples

More powerful at same cost

The following cards have the same cost, but one has an added ability or greater size.

More flexibility at same cost

The following cards have the same effect, but one is more restricted in its use.

Same effect but cost less

The following cards have the same effect, but one has a greater cost.

Instant instead of sorcery

The following are cards that have the same effect and cost but are instants instead of sorceries.

Multiple upgrades

Some cards may be strictly better in multiple respects but are only strictly better overall if they have no attributes inferior to the card they are compared with.

References

  1. Mark Rosewater (March 31, 2003). "This Land is My Land". magicthegathering.com. Wizards of the Coast.
  2. Mark Rosewater (January 10, 2022). "Even More Words From R&D". magicthegathering.com. Wizards of the Coast.
  3. Mark Rosewater (July 20, 2014). "Does the term "strictly better" care about creature types?". Blogatog. Tumblr.
  4. Mark Rosewater (September 07, 2017). "Can you please give us a definition of the term "Strictly Better"?". Blogatog. Tumblr.
  5. Mike Flores (March 03, 2014). "Strictly Superior". magicthegathering.com. Wizards of the Coast.
  6. Mike Flores (March 10, 2014). "Redundancy". magicthegathering.com. Wizards of the Coast.
  7. Sam Stoddard (November 4, 2016). "Strictly Better". magicthegathering.com. Wizards of the Coast.