Talk:Zendikar Rising
Some help needed. How come that the template for the preconstructed decks (commander decks) doesn't refer to the right page? --Hunter (talk) 16:44, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- I think the redirect got changed to have a lowercased d in "decks" now, so I changed it to reflect it. It should work now. Neo (talk) 18:43, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, it doesn't. It creates Zendikar Rising/TBA --Hunter (talk) 19:25, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- I think Yanderesliver figured something out. It looks like it works now by treating them like Eldraine's Brawl decks. Neo (talk) 20:33, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- The commander deck logic want to have one subpage per deck, but the brawl deck logic which works almost identical can life with one subpage. - Yandere Sliver
23:11, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- The commander deck logic want to have one subpage per deck, but the brawl deck logic which works almost identical can life with one subpage. - Yandere Sliver
- I think Yanderesliver figured something out. It looks like it works now by treating them like Eldraine's Brawl decks. Neo (talk) 20:33, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, it doesn't. It creates Zendikar Rising/TBA --Hunter (talk) 19:25, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Do we list both sides of a modal DFC when referring to the card?
- Pros: Easier to reference for readers; more complete info; arguably a default "front side" doesn't exist if either can be chosen in play, so both listings are valid.
- Cons: Hover on the back and the image still defaults to front side, which isn't useful; prerogative for DFCs is to only list the front side; listing both takes up more space, which imo looks ugly on the Cycle tables.
I vote only list the front side of a modal DFC, but would like to hear other opinions. Tm123123 (talk) 21:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- I would like to list both sides unless we refer to a specific effect that only one side has. Otherwise the listed information isn't really complete.
- Emeria's Call creates 4/4 Angel Warriors
- Riverglide Pathway // Lavaglide Pathway is part of a cycle of dual lands.
- This is also consistent how we handle split card (which essentially have two modes.
- Fire // Ice is a split card. But Ice let's you draw a card.
- - Yandere Sliver 16:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Regarding the pathway lands. I put them in the mega cycle category. I also upgraded them to show both sided. I think that is a rather clean way to display both sides of the card. Thoughts? - Yandere Sliver 15:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Regarding the pathway lands. I put them in the mega cycle category. I also upgraded them to show both sided. I think that is a rather clean way to display both sides of the card. Thoughts? - Yandere Sliver
Regarding the Pathway Lands
Shouldn't they listed as partial cycle (or even mega cycle) instead of double cycle? After all, it's pretty much known that they are not really a proper cycle here and would only be completed in upcoming sets. --Aeris Ventaile (talk) 14:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- good point. - Yandere Sliver 15:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Do these count as cycles?
Just now, I've been browsing Scryfall and I realized that this set has 3 mythics for the five main mono-colors: https://scryfall.com/search?q=set%3Aznr+rarity%3Am&unique=cards&as=grid&order=set Should we make two new cycles, one for Mythic Legendary Permanents and another for Mythic Creatures?
Theme Booster Cardlists
Could someone add a section with cardlists for the Theme Boosters?
~ Mando Jetii (talk) 18:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)