User talk:Oracle of Truth: Difference between revisions
>Fishysua No edit summary |
>@DeletedUser40283073 No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Well the category is meant for basic concepts to ''describe'' decks an plays. Adding every deck to this category does not really help (other decks will receive an analysis eventually). I left Dark Confidant since I thought it is special enough and a significant example in Magic theory to warrant the addition. --[[User:Oracle of Truth|Oracle of Truth]] 14:48, 7 May 2006 (CDT) | *Well the category is meant for basic concepts to ''describe'' decks an plays. Adding every deck to this category does not really help (other decks will receive an analysis eventually). I left Dark Confidant since I thought it is special enough and a significant example in Magic theory to warrant the addition. --[[User:Oracle of Truth|Oracle of Truth]] 14:48, 7 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
I had no intention of adding every deck. Really, I was just adding the section since I doubt I'll have time to replicate it for other decks. Still, I won't put it back if you don't want. No real need, I've linked there as an example from Statistical Analysis itself so... Of course, my worst nightmare is if someone comes along and wins regionals with a post-Dissension Heezy Street decklist thus changing the analysis from useful example to just plain wrong. I would have to find the section somewhere else to live. [[User:Fishysua|Fishysua]] 14:53, 7 May 2006 (CDT) | I had no intention of adding every deck. Really, I was just adding the section since I doubt I'll have time to replicate it for other decks. Still, I won't put it back if you don't want. No real need, I've linked there as an example from Statistical Analysis itself so... Of course, my worst nightmare is if someone comes along and wins regionals with a post-Dissension Heezy Street decklist thus changing the analysis from useful example to just plain wrong. I would have to find the section somewhere else to live. [[User:Fishysua|Fishysua]] 14:53, 7 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
*I am not sure whether I understand you. I don't mind the section about the analysis, it's just the category that did not fit in my opinion. --[[User:Oracle of Truth|Oracle of Truth]] 14:57, 7 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:57, 7 May 2006
I actually added the Magic Theory cat to Heezy Street because I'm not sure I'll actually be able to go through all the mess to get a Statistical Analysis section for other decks before it is too late, especially since Heezy Street is amazingly simple from a statistical perspective. I'll point out that I've also added it to Dark Confidant because of a similar section which I hope to create a seperate page for Card Advantage modified Statisical Analysis but for now it will live inside Dark Confidant. What do you think? Fishysua 14:43, 7 May 2006 (CDT)
- Well the category is meant for basic concepts to describe decks an plays. Adding every deck to this category does not really help (other decks will receive an analysis eventually). I left Dark Confidant since I thought it is special enough and a significant example in Magic theory to warrant the addition. --Oracle of Truth 14:48, 7 May 2006 (CDT)
I had no intention of adding every deck. Really, I was just adding the section since I doubt I'll have time to replicate it for other decks. Still, I won't put it back if you don't want. No real need, I've linked there as an example from Statistical Analysis itself so... Of course, my worst nightmare is if someone comes along and wins regionals with a post-Dissension Heezy Street decklist thus changing the analysis from useful example to just plain wrong. I would have to find the section somewhere else to live. Fishysua 14:53, 7 May 2006 (CDT)
- I am not sure whether I understand you. I don't mind the section about the analysis, it's just the category that did not fit in my opinion. --Oracle of Truth 14:57, 7 May 2006 (CDT)