User talk:Archlich631

Hi and thanks for your help! You asked about prerevisionist sources few times, so I thought I'd explain. There are two policies concerning it. First says that any place/person/event/other thing that appeared or was mentioned in any form in pre-rev sources (so its concept was created before revision started) has Category:Prerevisionist. Second rule is that all pre-rev info is canon unless revisionist sources contradict them. Sure, you're right that it should be clearly marked where is revisionist part and where pre-rev one. Although, so far articles with mixed pre-rev/rev are rather rare or saying about different time periods - so there is no real problem. Anyway, creating more clear distinction between pre-rev and rev info in articles is a matter of (hopefully, near) future. --^MOR_T ^(T) 21:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I'm new to this site, so hopefully I'm doing everything correctly.

Thanks for the information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Archlich (talk • contribs).

It's ok. But remember to sign your messages. Just write ~~~~. --^MOR_T ^(T) 22:16, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I will. Archlich 22:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi, and thanks again for your great work. I just come to give one suggestion. In the Kamigawa article all locations should be only listed. Very locations should be in their own articles. The same goes for Mercadia and other planes. --^MOR_T ^(T) 20:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)