User talk:Archlich631

Hi and thanks for your help! You asked about prerevisionist sources few times, so I thought I'd explain. There are two policies concerning it. First says that any place/person/event/other thing that appeared or was mentioned in any form in pre-rev sources (so its concept was created before revision started) has Category:Prerevisionist. Second rule is that all pre-rev info is canon unless revisionist sources contradict them. Sure, you're right that it should be clearly marked where is revisionist part and where pre-rev one. Although, so far articles with mixed pre-rev/rev are rather rare or saying about different time periods - so there is no real problem. Anyway, creating more clear distinction between pre-rev and rev info in articles is a matter of (hopefully, near) future. --^MOR_T ^(T) 21:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I'm new to this site, so hopefully I'm doing everything correctly.

Thanks for the information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Archlich (talk • contribs).

It's ok. But remember to sign your messages. Just write ~~~~. --^MOR_T ^(T) 22:16, 6 July 2007 (UTC)