Talk:Magic: The Gathering/Statistics and trivia: Difference between revisions
>@legacy41915546 (→Template:Gatherer search: new section) |
>@legacy41915546 No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Source Problems== | ==Source Problems== | ||
Source refs to the new the gatherer doesn't give the formatting. The problem is due to [] in the source code. E.g: I have entered the following title in Ref code: http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?action=advanced&color=+![W]+![U]+![B]+![R]+[G]+![C]. The code sees a [] at each end at "W]". The end of the code should be at "C]" not "W]." --[[User:Magicthe|Magicthe]] 08:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC) | Source refs to the new the gatherer doesn't give the formatting. The problem is due to [] in the source code. E.g: I have entered the following title in Ref code: http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?action=advanced&color=+![W]+![U]+![B]+![R]+[G]+![C]. The code sees a [] at each end at "W]". The end of the code should be at "C]" not "W]." --[[User:Magicthe|Magicthe]] 08:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
:What? --[[User:Magic Mage|<font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">agic</font> <font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">age</font>]] ([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|<font color="red">talk!</font>]]) 09:33, 1 November 2012 (EDT) | |||
==Breach of Rules== | ==Breach of Rules== | ||
"Only legal card allowing for the breach of rules: Relentless Rats" -- That's not true. There are many breaches of rules around ie. <c>Platinum Angel</c>, and to a lesser extent Kobolds that are red eventhough they cost {0}. As with relentless rats they "break the rules", but are upheld by the "Golden Rule" (e.g. Cards trump CompRules). Otherwise I love this page. :-) --[[User:GWiZ665|GWiZ665]] 19:11, 15 April 2007 (CDT) | "Only legal card allowing for the breach of rules: Relentless Rats" -- That's not true. There are many breaches of rules around ie. <c>Platinum Angel</c>, and to a lesser extent Kobolds that are red eventhough they cost {0}. As with relentless rats they "break the rules", but are upheld by the "Golden Rule" (e.g. Cards trump CompRules). Otherwise I love this page. :-) --[[User:GWiZ665|GWiZ665]] 19:11, 15 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
: Oh... didn't know that. Guess it should be changed. I messed up the card totals a bit... I'll do an actual full count later... or something. --[[User:Xallium|Xallium]] 19:59, 15 April 2007 (CDT) | : Oh... didn't know that. Guess it should be changed. I messed up the card totals a bit... I'll do an actual full count later... or something. --[[User:Xallium|Xallium]] 19:59, 15 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
::What as well? --[[User:Magic Mage|<font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">agic</font> <font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">age</font>]] ([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|<font color="red">talk!</font>]]) 09:33, 1 November 2012 (EDT) | |||
==Totals== | ==Totals== | ||
Line 17: | Line 22: | ||
I'm almost certain that your color numbers are a bit off, as gold cards are counted as all their colors as well. E.g. <c>Watchwolf</c> is green and white and gold.--[[User:GWiZ665|GWiZ665]] 11:45, 16 April 2007 (CDT) | I'm almost certain that your color numbers are a bit off, as gold cards are counted as all their colors as well. E.g. <c>Watchwolf</c> is green and white and gold.--[[User:GWiZ665|GWiZ665]] 11:45, 16 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
:I watched (pun intended) and <c>Watchwolf</c> did not show up on the green nor white list, only on the multi-color listing. --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 13:40, 16 April 2007 (CDT) | :I watched (pun intended) and <c>Watchwolf</c> did not show up on the green nor white list, only on the multi-color listing. --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 13:40, 16 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Consenses about formatting == | == Consenses about formatting == | ||
Line 25: | Line 27: | ||
Ok. We need to come up with a decision about how we format some of these points. Do we do it like # (card) or Card (#)?{{Unsigned|Xallium|22:52, 15 April 2007 (CDT)}} | Ok. We need to come up with a decision about how we format some of these points. Do we do it like # (card) or Card (#)?{{Unsigned|Xallium|22:52, 15 April 2007 (CDT)}} | ||
:I like Card (#) --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 08:57, 16 April 2007 (CDT) | :I like Card (#) --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 08:57, 16 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Hybrid == | == Hybrid == | ||
Line 46: | Line 44: | ||
== Link on Main Page? == | == Link on Main Page? == | ||
This is a very interesting page, but unfortunately nothing links here. So how about adding a link to the main page? [[User:Oracle of Truth|Oracle of Truth]] 00:38, 11 March 2008 (GMT) | |||
:The other items under "Browse our Virtual Library" section on the main page are all Categories. Do you think it would look good to add a link to [[:Category: Trivia]]. I love this page myself. Thoughts on where to put it on main page? --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 01:52, 11 March 2008 (GMT) | :The other items under "Browse our Virtual Library" section on the main page are all Categories. Do you think it would look good to add a link to [[:Category: Trivia]]. I love this page myself. Thoughts on where to put it on main page? --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 01:52, 11 March 2008 (GMT) | ||
::The Virtual Library section is a good idea, but I would point the link directly to this page, because it has much more information. And maybe add a "see also: [[:Category: Trivia]]" at the beginning of this page. [[User:Oracle of Truth|Oracle of Truth]] 01:52, 16 March 2008 (GMT) | ::The Virtual Library section is a good idea, but I would point the link directly to this page, because it has much more information. And maybe add a "see also: [[:Category: Trivia]]" at the beginning of this page. [[User:Oracle of Truth|Oracle of Truth]] 01:52, 16 March 2008 (GMT) | ||
:::Some time later, I disagree. FWIW, though. Whatever. --[[User:Magic Mage|<font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">agic</font> <font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">age</font>]] ([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|<font color="red">talk!</font>]]) 09:33, 1 November 2012 (EDT) | |||
== Converted mana cost == | == Converted mana cost == | ||
Hi GeoMike, I think you have been a bit overeager: While mana costs are made up of symbols, converted mana costs are just plain numbers (see <c>Gaddock Teeg</c> for instance). [[User:Oracle of Truth|Oracle of Truth]] 22:57, 30 March 2008 (BST) | Hi GeoMike, I think you have been a bit overeager: While mana costs are made up of symbols, converted mana costs are just plain numbers (see <c>Gaddock Teeg</c> for instance). [[User:Oracle of Truth|Oracle of Truth]] 22:57, 30 March 2008 (BST) | ||
:Yes, your right. Now I need to figure out which ones to change back. I'll just change them all back. --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 23:45, 30 March 2008 (BST) | :Yes, your right. Now I need to figure out which ones to change back. I'll just change them all back. --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 23:45, 30 March 2008 (BST) | ||
== Highest activation cost == | == Highest activation cost == | ||
Unless I'm confused over what this part means, it isn't <c>Stalking Stones</c>; the invokers like <c>Flamewave Invoker</c> have an activation cost of 8. If it just means activation costs on lands, <c>Urza's Factory</c> has a cost of 7 rather than Stalking Stones' 6. | Unless I'm confused over what this part means, it isn't <c>Stalking Stones</c>; the invokers like <c>Flamewave Invoker</c> have an activation cost of 8. If it just means activation costs on lands, <c>Urza's Factory</c> has a cost of 7 rather than Stalking Stones' 6. | ||
==Highest Artifact Activation Cost== | ==Highest Artifact Activation Cost== | ||
Activation cost: <c>Aladdin's Ring</c> (8) | Activation cost: <c>Aladdin's Ring</c> (8) | ||
Revision as of 13:33, 1 November 2012
Source Problems
Source refs to the new the gatherer doesn't give the formatting. The problem is due to [] in the source code. E.g: I have entered the following title in Ref code: http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Search/Default.aspx?action=advanced&color=+![W]+![U]+![B]+![R]+[G]+![C]. The code sees a [] at each end at "W]". The end of the code should be at "C]" not "W]." --Magicthe 08:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- What? --Magic Mage (talk!) 09:33, 1 November 2012 (EDT)
Breach of Rules
"Only legal card allowing for the breach of rules: Relentless Rats" -- That's not true. There are many breaches of rules around ie. Platinum Angel, and to a lesser extent Kobolds that are red eventhough they cost {0}. As with relentless rats they "break the rules", but are upheld by the "Golden Rule" (e.g. Cards trump CompRules). Otherwise I love this page. :-) --GWiZ665 19:11, 15 April 2007 (CDT)
- Oh... didn't know that. Guess it should be changed. I messed up the card totals a bit... I'll do an actual full count later... or something. --Xallium 19:59, 15 April 2007 (CDT)
- What as well? --Magic Mage (talk!) 09:33, 1 November 2012 (EDT)
Totals
Ok the totals I have are a little off as they exclude alternate editions/revisions, starter sets, and banned sets. I tried to have my search on MagicCards.info include the legal Starter Sets, but it yielded no results (must have been too many cards rendered or something). I think the totals should include Total Absolute Cards (including banned + unglued + revisions), Total Cards (including banned [not unglued]), and Total Legal Cards (just... legal cards). However, can anybody think of an easy way to find this without a 'brute force' attack?
Btw, the Flying figure is imperfect. My search includes everything that has the text 'Flying' in it and the only plausable way to find the exact number of actual flying creatures is just to sort through every page. So where the edit is, there is an unseen number which lists the last page checked (on the MagicCards.info page) to remove non-keyworded 'Flyers'. (yes, I know this sentence is really confusing). Would suck if flying wasn't the largest eh? --Xallium 20:58, 15 April 2007 (CDT)
- Flying has to be the biggest keyword hands down :) --GeoMike 21:04, 15 April 2007 (CDT)
If you check the history on Flying, I actually tried something similar to this on each Keyword page, but seeing as every card with Flying written in Oracle was counted, it didn't work. (Even ~ deals damage to non-flying creatures was counted *sigh*). If somehow gatherer or magiccards.info could be hardwired to do something like ("Creature" + "Flying") + ("instant" + "sorcery" + flying - nonflying) and probably even more... Not an easy boolean. ;-) --GWiZ665 11:43, 16 April 2007 (CDT)
I'm almost certain that your color numbers are a bit off, as gold cards are counted as all their colors as well. E.g. Watchwolf is green and white and gold.--GWiZ665 11:45, 16 April 2007 (CDT)
- I watched (pun intended) and Watchwolf did not show up on the green nor white list, only on the multi-color listing. --GeoMike 13:40, 16 April 2007 (CDT)
Consenses about formatting
Ok. We need to come up with a decision about how we format some of these points. Do we do it like # (card) or Card (#)?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xallium (talk • contribs) 22:52, 15 April 2007 (CDT).
- I like Card (#) --GeoMike 08:57, 16 April 2007 (CDT)
Hybrid
I added converted mana costs (using hybrid) as a whim, not sure I like it or not. What does everyone else think? --GeoMike 20:23, 16 April 2007 (CDT)
Lands
The lands total do not add up:
- Total lands: 332
- Gatherer Database: Results. Retrieved 06-17-2007.
- Basic lands: 10
- Subtype snow:5
- Non-Basic lands: 314
314 + 10 does not equal 332 hmmm
Link on Main Page?
This is a very interesting page, but unfortunately nothing links here. So how about adding a link to the main page? Oracle of Truth 00:38, 11 March 2008 (GMT)
- The other items under "Browse our Virtual Library" section on the main page are all Categories. Do you think it would look good to add a link to Category: Trivia. I love this page myself. Thoughts on where to put it on main page? --GeoMike 01:52, 11 March 2008 (GMT)
- The Virtual Library section is a good idea, but I would point the link directly to this page, because it has much more information. And maybe add a "see also: Category: Trivia" at the beginning of this page. Oracle of Truth 01:52, 16 March 2008 (GMT)
- Some time later, I disagree. FWIW, though. Whatever. --Magic Mage (talk!) 09:33, 1 November 2012 (EDT)
Converted mana cost
Hi GeoMike, I think you have been a bit overeager: While mana costs are made up of symbols, converted mana costs are just plain numbers (see Gaddock Teeg for instance). Oracle of Truth 22:57, 30 March 2008 (BST)
- Yes, your right. Now I need to figure out which ones to change back. I'll just change them all back. --GeoMike 23:45, 30 March 2008 (BST)
Highest activation cost
Unless I'm confused over what this part means, it isn't Stalking Stones; the invokers like Flamewave Invoker have an activation cost of 8. If it just means activation costs on lands, Urza's Factory has a cost of 7 rather than Stalking Stones' 6.
Highest Artifact Activation Cost
Activation cost: Aladdin's Ring (8)
Isn't Door to Nothingness's WWUUBBRRGG activation higher? --Toa of Mirrors, Founder of the Munchkin Wiki 05:24, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- You are correct, feel free to edit when you find mistakes. I corrected the entry. --GeoMike 10:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Most printed
What's the most printed card (excluding basic lands)? --Hunter61 08:26, 3 July 2011 (EDT)
Template:Gatherer search
Check the references. Write a line saying how up-to-date the article is.
Use the template.
Thank you for the compliance. --Magic Mage (talk!) 09:31, 1 November 2012 (EDT)