Talk:Nissa Revane: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Began discussion about retcon.) |
>Corveroth (Go for it!) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Retcon == | |||
Should the most current version of her story be called the "alternate version", since it's clearly the one that Wizards intends to use going forward? Yeah, it's a retcon. But as of the current story, it's actually what happened. It should be presented with as the main thrust of the article with a note about the retcon and her previous past. --[[Special:Contributions/70.91.82.129|70.91.82.129]] 20:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
: I concur. Information that is no longer valid, for any reason, should not be included within the core of the article except where appropriate to note that a change has occurred. The details of that change should be a separate section, subheading, sub-bullet, or footnote, as appropriate to the article. --[[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) | |||
== Zendikar 1 == | |||
there is no solid evidence that she will show up in zendicar--[[Special:Contributions/66.192.186.101|66.192.186.101]] 00:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC) | there is no solid evidence that she will show up in zendicar--[[Special:Contributions/66.192.186.101|66.192.186.101]] 00:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
oops never mind--[[Special:Contributions/66.192.186.101|66.192.186.101]] 00:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC) | oops never mind--[[Special:Contributions/66.192.186.101|66.192.186.101]] 00:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:53, 26 August 2015
Retcon
Should the most current version of her story be called the "alternate version", since it's clearly the one that Wizards intends to use going forward? Yeah, it's a retcon. But as of the current story, it's actually what happened. It should be presented with as the main thrust of the article with a note about the retcon and her previous past. --70.91.82.129 20:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- I concur. Information that is no longer valid, for any reason, should not be included within the core of the article except where appropriate to note that a change has occurred. The details of that change should be a separate section, subheading, sub-bullet, or footnote, as appropriate to the article. --Corveroth (talk)
Zendikar 1
there is no solid evidence that she will show up in zendicar--66.192.186.101 00:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC) oops never mind--66.192.186.101 00:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)