Talk:Jace Beleren: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
im>Randel
No edit summary
 
>LegacymtgsalvationUser8147
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Do we really need the official WotC blurb here?  It seems to me that all we need to do is desribe the guy and then link to the official blurb.  Putting it in our own words then restating those words with WotC's words is redundant.  [[User:Randel|Randel]] 02:50, 24 October 2007 (BST)
Do we really need the official WotC blurb here?  It seems to me that all we need to do is desribe the guy and then link to the official blurb.  Putting it in our own words then restating those words with WotC's words is redundant.  [[User:Randel|Randel]] 02:50, 24 October 2007 (BST)
:Yeah, I agree. --<b><span style="color:#FF0000">[[User:MORT|<sup><sup>M</sup></sup><sup>O</sup>R<sub>T</sub>]]</span></b> <sup><b>[[User talk: MORT|(T)]]</b></sup> 16:01, 24 October 2007 (BST)

Revision as of 15:01, 24 October 2007

Do we really need the official WotC blurb here? It seems to me that all we need to do is desribe the guy and then link to the official blurb. Putting it in our own words then restating those words with WotC's words is redundant. Randel 02:50, 24 October 2007 (BST)

Yeah, I agree. --MORT (T) 16:01, 24 October 2007 (BST)