Talk:Boros Legion: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
>RivalRowan (→In-game references: new section) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* | *Boros Legion/Old | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
==Move== | ==Move== | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
::I removed this. --[[User:Magic Mage|<font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">agic</font> <font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">age</font>]] ([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|<font color="red">talk!</font>]]) 02:03, 6 November 2012 (EST) | ::I removed this. --[[User:Magic Mage|<font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">agic</font> <font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">age</font>]] ([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|<font color="red">talk!</font>]]) 02:03, 6 November 2012 (EST) | ||
==Two articles== | ==Two articles== | ||
So, we seem to have two pages. This one, and | So, we seem to have two pages. This one, and Boros Legion/Old. A fine mess. Which one should be deleted? --[[User:Hunter61|Hunter61]] ([[User talk:Hunter61|talk]]) 17:29, 27 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
* Removed the newer page --[[User:Hunter61|Hunter61]] ([[User talk:Hunter61|talk]]) 07:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC) | * Removed the newer page --[[User:Hunter61|Hunter61]] ([[User talk:Hunter61|talk]]) 07:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:So far we know, it's just a coincidence. --[[Special:Contributions/77.169.167.246|77.169.167.246]] 19:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC) | :So far we know, it's just a coincidence. --[[Special:Contributions/77.169.167.246|77.169.167.246]] 19:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
:: According to MaRo, the guild is not named after the artist ([https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/174294812888/is-the-boros-guild-named-after-zoltan-boros Source one], [https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/177385763438/i-forgot-to-ask-on-my-birthday-so-i-waited-for source two]), [https://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/174294812888/is-the-boros-guild-named-after-zoltan-boros nor is the artist named after the guild]. [[User:RudleyDudley|RudleyDudley]] ([[User talk:RudleyDudley|talk]]) 01:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
== In-game references == | |||
{{main|Talk:Cult of Rakdos#In-game references}} | |||
At the time of writing, the Cult of Rakdos was the only guild article to have an in-game references section but that section was incomplete. After discussing on Discord whether the guild pages should have such a section, the consensus was no. Including it would mean including every card with a guild watermark and that doesn't really provide readers any value, just volume. -- [[User:RivalRowan|RivalRowan]] ([[User talk:RivalRowan|talk]]) 22:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:20, 15 January 2024
- Boros Legion/Old
Move
Shouldn't this be moved to Boros to conform with the other guilds? -- GWiZ665
- This isn't just copy/pasted from the MTG.com article, i hope?VestDan 10:05, 19 May 2006 (CDT)
- Nope, not a copy/paste job. Heavily referenced though. I basicly rewrote the minisite and Matt's collumn. There's a little more that I want to do to it to make it more different, but I just haven't gotten to it yet. Randel 15:24, 20 May 2006 (CDT)
- Note: "League of Wojek" simply redirects here, there is no reason to link to "League of Wojek" within this article. Randel 12:15, 22 May 2006 (CDT)
Rewrite
The following content on the hierarchy of the Boros Legion was moved, and is to be rewritten. --Magic Mage (talk!) 13:50, 1 September 2012 (EDT)
No rewrite has been done, remerging the pages. --Hunter61 (talk) 07:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Angelfist
Can someone please delete this? We have no idea that it is real and isn't a troll. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 5 November 2012 (talk • contribs).
- Pretty sure it's a PH. --Kraken Chowder 101 (talk) 20:45, 5 November 2012 (EST)
- Placeholder or not, doesn't belong. Removed. Barinellos (talk) 03:36, 6 November 2012 (EST)
- "Unknown at the moment" or not, "Unknown at the moment" does not belong either. Removed. --Magic Mage (talk!) 05:12, 6 November 2012 (EST)
Removed
In the Gatecrash advertising, it shows the Planeswalker Gideon Jura aligned with the Boros Legion to "fight for your guild".
- I removed this. --Magic Mage (talk!) 02:03, 6 November 2012 (EST)
Two articles
So, we seem to have two pages. This one, and Boros Legion/Old. A fine mess. Which one should be deleted? --Hunter61 (talk) 17:29, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Zoltan Boros
Is the Boros Legion named after the artist Zoltan Boros whose work features on nearly 200 Magic cards, or is that a coincidence? --96.241.0.221 18:41, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- So far we know, it's just a coincidence. --77.169.167.246 19:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- According to MaRo, the guild is not named after the artist (Source one, source two), nor is the artist named after the guild. RudleyDudley (talk) 01:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
In-game references
At the time of writing, the Cult of Rakdos was the only guild article to have an in-game references section but that section was incomplete. After discussing on Discord whether the guild pages should have such a section, the consensus was no. Including it would mean including every card with a guild watermark and that doesn't really provide readers any value, just volume. -- RivalRowan (talk) 22:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)