User talk:Oracle of Truth: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
>Fishysua
No edit summary
>Taylor1690@legacy41916549
No edit summary
 
(85 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I actually added the [[Magic Theory]] cat to Heezy Street because I'm not sure I'll actually be able to go through all the mess to get a [[Statistical Analysis]] section for other decks before it is too late, especially since [[Standard RG Beats Deck :: Heezy Street|Heezy Street]] is amazingly simple from a statistical perspective.  I'll point out that I've also added it to [[Dark Confidant]] because of a similar section which I hope to create a seperate page for ''[[Card Advantage]] modified  Statisical Analysis'' but for now it will live inside Dark Confidant.  What do you think? [[User:Fishysua|Fishysua]] 14:43, 7 May 2006 (CDT)
*[[User talk:Oracle of Truth/arch1|Archive 1 (Big Bang - July 2008)]]
*Well the category is meant for basic concepts to ''describe'' decks an plays. Adding every deck to this category does not really help (other decks will receive an analysis eventually). I left Dark Confidant since I thought it is special enough and a significant example in Magic theory to warrant the addition. --[[User:Oracle of Truth|Oracle of Truth]] 14:48, 7 May 2006 (CDT)
*[[User talk:Oracle of Truth/Archive2|Archive 2 (August 2008 - September 2008)]]
I had no intention of adding every deck. Really, I was just adding the section since I doubt I'll have time to replicate it for other decks. Still, I won't put it back if you don't want.  No real need, I've linked there as an example from Statistical Analysis itself so...  Of course, my worst nightmare is if someone comes along and wins regionals with a post-Dissension Heezy Street decklist thus changing the analysis from useful example to just plain wrong. I would have to find the section somewhere else to live.  [[User:Fishysua|Fishysua]] 14:53, 7 May 2006 (CDT)
*[[User talk:Oracle of Truth/Archive3|Archive 3 (Oktober 2008 - New Year's Eve 2008)]]
*I am not sure whether I understand you. I don't mind the section about the analysis, it's just the category that did not fit in my opinion. --[[User:Oracle of Truth|Oracle of Truth]] 14:57, 7 May 2006 (CDT)
 
:"Really, I was just adding the section since I doubt I'll have time to replicate it for other decks." probably should have read "Really, I was just adding the (Statistical Analysis) section to the category..."  I believe it will be important soon to connect Magic Theory to Magic Practice as it were. The tournament decks seem the best place to start. The community needs one to feed into the other and vis-versa even if some individuals stay primarily on one side or the other. I, for example, don't have a team, playtest partners, consistent or plentiful spare time, nor significant funds, the combination of all those will keep me pretty restricted to the theory side. [[User:Fishysua|Fishysua]] 15:20, 7 May 2006 (CDT)
Glad you're back :) --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 21:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
:Thx, it's good to be back :) . [[User:Oracle of Truth|Oracle of Truth]] 01:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 
Well, first things first! I forgot to mention that these curves follow the principles of sligh!
I have a long past with simulations and generaly reside in phyrexia.com where I post quite frequently about the discoveries on manacurves I make with my simulations. It's pretty advanced stuff though.
 
Since you have a background with simulations we might even strike a deal one day. I have been searching for a long time for someone to duplicate my simulations which actually involve a lot of troubles because of my personal background.
 
I'll pop away to see if I can find a link to some of my "works"
 
WICKEDDARKMAN
 
No really good link anywhere! Just a lot of posts that are losely interlinked.
Are you interrested in working on a sim though?
 
MORT will be able to tell you a bit about me!
 
 
12:23, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[[User:Taylor|Taylor]]
I have only edited the wiki one other time in my life, and that was to change parts of my OWN wiki page that were wrong.(and then Magic Mage IP banned me for doing it) I know nothing about what 'style' the wiki should be in.
 
I was TRYING, on this thread, to get someone that DID know more about the 'style' the wiki should be in to update that page, with more information. I left the part already there. I feel that what MORT said in post #5 of this thread should be added to the wiki page. I don't care about the 'style' in which those extra facts are added, only that they are.
 
MORT pointed out that the 'style' I used was 'wrong,' and I tried editing it, but I don't really know anything about writing MtGS Wiki pages in 'the proper style.' Lets face it, 'style' is a VERY subjective thing anyway, and I don't 'get it' right now.
 
 
I will request that someone that DOES know about how to update the wiki page 'the proper way' do it, with the extra information. Since the current information is misleading to the point of being wrong.
-Taylor
12:23, 9 September 2009 (UTC)~~

Latest revision as of 12:23, 9 September 2009

Glad you're back :) --GeoMike 21:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Thx, it's good to be back :) . Oracle of Truth 01:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, first things first! I forgot to mention that these curves follow the principles of sligh! I have a long past with simulations and generaly reside in phyrexia.com where I post quite frequently about the discoveries on manacurves I make with my simulations. It's pretty advanced stuff though.

Since you have a background with simulations we might even strike a deal one day. I have been searching for a long time for someone to duplicate my simulations which actually involve a lot of troubles because of my personal background.

I'll pop away to see if I can find a link to some of my "works"

WICKEDDARKMAN

No really good link anywhere! Just a lot of posts that are losely interlinked. Are you interrested in working on a sim though?

MORT will be able to tell you a bit about me!


12:23, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Taylor I have only edited the wiki one other time in my life, and that was to change parts of my OWN wiki page that were wrong.(and then Magic Mage IP banned me for doing it) I know nothing about what 'style' the wiki should be in.

I was TRYING, on this thread, to get someone that DID know more about the 'style' the wiki should be in to update that page, with more information. I left the part already there. I feel that what MORT said in post #5 of this thread should be added to the wiki page. I don't care about the 'style' in which those extra facts are added, only that they are.

MORT pointed out that the 'style' I used was 'wrong,' and I tried editing it, but I don't really know anything about writing MtGS Wiki pages in 'the proper style.' Lets face it, 'style' is a VERY subjective thing anyway, and I don't 'get it' right now.


I will request that someone that DOES know about how to update the wiki page 'the proper way' do it, with the extra information. Since the current information is misleading to the point of being wrong. -Taylor 12:23, 9 September 2009 (UTC)~~

Retrieved from "https://mtg.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Oracle_of_Truth&oldid=66775"