Talk:Utility card: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Hunterofsalvation No edit summary |
>Hunterofsalvation No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I'm not clear if creatures like <c>Satyr Wayfinder</c> fall within my own definition, but they are close. [[User:Circeus|Circeus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 21:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC) | I'm not clear if creatures like <c>Satyr Wayfinder</c> fall within my own definition, but they are close. [[User:Circeus|Circeus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 21:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
: I've asked it for you --[[User:Hunterofsalvation|Hunter]] ([[User talk:Hunterofsalvation|talk]]) 07:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC) http://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/171251496393/dear-mark-how-would-you-define-a-utility | |||
Latest revision as of 07:21, 25 February 2018
Utility creatures
I always understood such creatures to be "bombs" or "build-around" creatures, e.g. Oracle of Mul Daya or Archetype of Courage. A utility creature to me is a relatively small creature that is intended to remain on the battlefield and provide a useful or even important effect, often activated, but by default does not get involved in combat, things like Mana creatures, pingers, tappers, Spirit of the Labyrinth...
I'm not clear if creatures like Satyr Wayfinder fall within my own definition, but they are close. Circeus (talk) 21:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- I've asked it for you --Hunter (talk) 07:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC) http://markrosewater.tumblr.com/post/171251496393/dear-mark-how-would-you-define-a-utility