Phasing: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

23 February 2024

31 January 2024

27 December 2023

19 July 2023

6 June 2023

18 April 2023

5 April 2023

2 March 2023

16 February 2023

2 February 2023

18 January 2023

13 January 2023

14 November 2022

26 September 2022

24 August 2022

18 August 2022

30 July 2022

21 July 2022

19 July 2022

  • curprev 10:5610:56, 19 July 2022>Neoheart 12,351 bytes −200 *le poof*
  • curprev 08:3208:32, 19 July 2022>Jerodast 12,551 bytes −198 ONLY these enchantments grant Phasing ''ability''! Others simply phase something out, like many other cards do. Personally I have no use for this section; I invite anyone to delete. Feels like an artifact of a time when "Enchantments that grant (keyword)" was considered an important list to maintain. Certainly, if we expand it beyond direct granting of ability, we'd have to acknowledge that focusing on enchantments is utterly arbitrary, and expand it to the point of uselessness - let's not.

18 July 2022

12 July 2022

  • curprev 05:5505:55, 12 July 2022>Jerodastm 12,646 bytes −12 Bit of a run-on sentence there. I'm really skeptical that we need to actually summarize what summoning sickness is here (as long as we link it), but let's see how it feels for a bit.
  • curprev 05:5105:51, 12 July 2022>Jerodast 12,658 bytes +38 Update set. Label storm scale numbers. Note: As far as I know the storm_ref parameter is just for convenience, we can just manually format the "storm" parameter in these odd cases and not try to blend in the extra param in a way it wasn't meant for - but correct me if I'm wrong :)

11 July 2022

20 April 2022

15 April 2022

14 April 2022

6 April 2022

  • curprev 19:2819:28, 6 April 2022>Jerodast 12,510 bytes +62 good call. new search should cover "until" and also eliminate phalse positives. (yes that was a pun but I suppooooose that doesn't belong on the main pages)
  • curprev 11:3711:37, 6 April 2022220.238.166.249 talk 12,448 bytes +18 Was "phalse" a pun? Regardless, Out of Time has "phase out... until" which is another searchable phrase, but no other card does similar.

5 April 2022

  • curprev 06:0706:07, 5 April 2022>Jerodast 12,430 bytes +475 This ref didn't really apply in the lead paragraph, which may have been my fault in the big revision. Brought in some of the design points from the article which actually fit nicely at the Beginning of History (woOOOoooOOo). Also the cited article is actually a reprint of a Duelist article.
  • curprev 05:2605:26, 5 April 2022>Jerodastm 11,955 bytes −4 this is now in the past
  • curprev 04:3504:35, 5 April 2022>Jerodast 11,959 bytes +904 Infobox stats & search: Distinguished between phasing (including granting phasing, but not cards that interact with phasing creatures) and "phase out" (excluding prevention of phasing out & triggers on itself phasing out). Matched up refs in lead vs main body, plus new scryfall/empirical refnote regarding color pie..
  • curprev 03:1603:16, 5 April 2022>Jerodast 11,055 bytes +409 Clarifying clause about "primary" color. Quotation marks to consistently denote "phase out" being referred to as a design concept. Emphasizing time gap more strongly (I think the 20 years figure is more significant than the 13, if I had to choose only one), with additional Scryfall search ref.

4 April 2022

  • curprev 22:0522:05, 4 April 2022220.238.166.249 talk 10,646 bytes +1 "Primary in" is a design term, regardless of the actual statistics; numbers are also skewed due to the historical vs current usage
  • curprev 21:2821:28, 4 April 2022>Christian Lee 10,645 bytes −1 Looking at Statistics, there's more Blue cards with Phasing than there are White.

15 March 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)