Talk:Alliances

Why the subsubsubheadings/level 4 headings?

Why the subsubsubheadings/level 4 headings?--Magic Mage 05:57, 17 November 2006 (CST)

I'm not completely sure what you mean, but if you are referring to the formatting of the section headings, I have set them all to this formatting as a way to maintain consistency throughout the sets pages. I was using a different formatting, but someone else came along and reformatted them all to this format, so I just continued using it. I'm guessing someone liked the way it looked. If you like, go ahead and change them all back and I will continue to use that. Just make a note here so I know. -BAMooore 23:55 08 December 2006 (EST)

Modal Spells

Under Points of Interest it says "Fatal Lore, Library of Lat-Nam and Misfortune are the first modal spells to give the choice to your opponent." They might be the first from an expansion set, but Healing Salve is the first modal spell. --GeoMike 19:29, 7 March 2007 (CST)

Healing Salve does not give the choice to the opponent, hence the twist on modal spells. Bamooore 20070406

You are correct, I overlooked the "opponent" in the sentence hehe --GeoMike 23:49, 6 April 2007 (CDT)

Alliances rarity breakdown

The Alliances_Checklist.txt at Wizards site lists only 9 C3's and Gorilla Shaman at U5 (U3+U2). Does anybody know if this is correct or the current rarity breakdown with 10 C3's and 5 U6's, which Cold Alice reestablished without a comment after I tried to change it? The Wizards checklists are known to be flawed (for example the homelands one). Sloth 15:17, 14 August 2008 (EDT)

I find that Magic Librarities information is more reliable then Wizard's. --GeoMike 15:26, 14 August 2008 (EDT)

Where Does it list rarity breakdowns? Sloth 15:47, 14 August 2008 (EDT)

Not Magic Librarities - I'm drawing a blank as to the correct website, I'll find it tonight when I get home. --GeoMike 16:16, 14 August 2008 (EDT)

Maybe you mean crystalkeep? Sloth 16:29, 14 August 2008 (EDT)

Yes, I got the information from them http://www.crystalkeep.com/magic/ --GeoMike 18:15, 14 August 2008 (EDT)

Well at the moment the rarity breakdown in the article is neither the one from crystalkeep nor the one from wizards, but it's still quite believeable because it would mean 110 cards per printing sheet for every rarity. Maybe someone with more knowledge then us two should comment on this. Sloth 19:31, 14 August 2008 (EDT)