User:Faceless Wanderer/User talk:Wickeddarkman: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
im>Wickeddarkman
No edit summary
im>Wickeddarkman
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==MORT's welcoming and tips==
==Workbook==
Welcome Wicked Darkman! Phyrexian portals are nice devices to jump to another boards of Magic, aren't they? ;)
Your [[Counterbalance]] still focused on concept and not fact. need a preliminary section about the card--the set(s) it is from, when  released, what playformats. how successful they have been.
 
I have some small tips for you. You can click on edit page of this discussion to see how to do this:


card tags: <c>Glimpse of Nature</c>
card tags: <c>Glimpse of Nature</c>
=Title=
=Title=
==subtitles==
==subtitles==
Line 11: Line 8:
====etc.====
====etc.====
#REDIRECT [[Glimpse of Nature]]
#REDIRECT [[Glimpse of Nature]]
* you can sign in the talk pages by writting <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>


=Next Title=
==Known individuals==
And please, don't use CAPITALIZED TEXT but titles like above.
 
*[[Black Lotus|Here]] you'll find an example of a card article. -- [[User:MORT|MORT]]
* you can sign in the talk pages by writting <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>
[[User:MORT|MORT]][[User:VestDan|VestDan]]  
[[User:MORT|MORT]][[User:VestDan|VestDan]]  


Okay both:
To VestDan. You are keeping me bussy :) I always have a lot of projects going on, and generally I like to devide time equally to them, but I am trying very hard to create a monumental ammount of manacurves created by [[simulations]] (Please re-read that page to see if I'm going the rigth direction)
 
Take a look at this: [[Counterbalance]]. (I just made the page)
 
Thats how I intended Project combobrary to be (with an added "Central station") I hope that's enough to qualify as worthwhile ;)
 
Please sign your talk pages like MORT suggests, above.
 
Your [[Counterbalance]] is an improvement, but still a bit too focused on concept and not fact. You need to have at least a preliminary section about the card--the set(s) it is from, when it was released, what formats it has seen play in and how successful they have been.
 
Please, make your [[Simulations]] article make sense or we will delete it. Simply dumping statistical jargon is useless to users; you have to explain what statistics you are doing. Further, this isn't the place for posting RESULTS to statistical analyses and simulations; an article on the subject should talk about how Simulations are useful, and how they can be performed, with at most one or two examples. If you wish to actually showcase some simulations, this is not the place to do so; what you CAN do is create a thread on Salvation or elsewhere, and link to it in the footnote section of the Simulation article.


Please make these changes soon.[[User:VestDan|VestDan]] 09:33, 10 January 2007 (CST)
I will let simulations take precedence of my "combobrary" attempts
So I will hold back my urge to create hundreds of cardpages for now.
But that doesnt mean that others couldnt work on that. Is there a "place" to "post" ideas like the combobrary that are read often by skilled mtg wikitarians, like a project page or something ???


OK. Working on it...
So is the simulations page getting closer towards acceptance ???

Revision as of 16:40, 11 January 2007

Workbook

Your Counterbalance still focused on concept and not fact. need a preliminary section about the card--the set(s) it is from, when released, what playformats. how successful they have been.

card tags: Glimpse of Nature

Title

subtitles

more subtitles

etc.

  1. REDIRECT Glimpse of Nature
  • you can sign in the talk pages by writting ~~~~

Known individuals

MORTVestDan

To VestDan. You are keeping me bussy :) I always have a lot of projects going on, and generally I like to devide time equally to them, but I am trying very hard to create a monumental ammount of manacurves created by simulations (Please re-read that page to see if I'm going the rigth direction)

I will let simulations take precedence of my "combobrary" attempts So I will hold back my urge to create hundreds of cardpages for now. But that doesnt mean that others couldnt work on that. Is there a "place" to "post" ideas like the combobrary that are read often by skilled mtg wikitarians, like a project page or something ???

So is the simulations page getting closer towards acceptance ???

Retrieved from "https://mtg.wiki/index.php?title=User:Faceless_Wanderer/User_talk:Wickeddarkman&oldid=90575"