User:Faceless Wanderer/User talk:Wickeddarkman: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
im>Wickeddarkman
im>VestDan
Line 24: Line 24:


Thats how I intended Project combobrary to be (with an added "Central station") I hope that's enough to qualify as worthwhile ;)
Thats how I intended Project combobrary to be (with an added "Central station") I hope that's enough to qualify as worthwhile ;)
Please sign your talk pages like MORT suggests, above.
Your [[Counterbalance]] is an improvement, but still a bit too focused on concept and not fact. You need to have at least a preliminary section about the card--the set(s) it is from, when it was released, what formats it has seen play in and how successful they have been.
Please, make your [[Simulations]] article make sense or we will delete it. Simply dumping statistical jargon is useless to users; you have to explain what statistics you are doing. Further, this isn't the place for posting RESULTS to statistical analyses and simulations; an article on the subject should talk about how Simulations are useful, and how they can be performed, with at most one or two examples. If you wish to actually showcase some simulations, this is not the place to do so; what you CAN do is create a thread on Salvation or elsewhere, and link to it in the footnote section of the Simulation article.
Please make these changes soon.[[User:VestDan|VestDan]] 09:33, 10 January 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 15:33, 10 January 2007

MORT's welcoming and tips

Welcome Wicked Darkman! Phyrexian portals are nice devices to jump to another boards of Magic, aren't they? ;)

I have some small tips for you. You can click on edit page of this discussion to see how to do this:

card tags: Glimpse of Nature

Title

subtitles

more subtitles

etc.

  1. REDIRECT Glimpse of Nature

Next Title

And please, don't use CAPITALIZED TEXT but titles like above.

  • Here you'll find an example of a card article. -- MORT
  • you can sign in the talk pages by writting ~~~~

MORTVestDan

Okay both:

Take a look at this: Counterbalance. (I just made the page)

Thats how I intended Project combobrary to be (with an added "Central station") I hope that's enough to qualify as worthwhile ;)

Please sign your talk pages like MORT suggests, above.

Your Counterbalance is an improvement, but still a bit too focused on concept and not fact. You need to have at least a preliminary section about the card--the set(s) it is from, when it was released, what formats it has seen play in and how successful they have been.

Please, make your Simulations article make sense or we will delete it. Simply dumping statistical jargon is useless to users; you have to explain what statistics you are doing. Further, this isn't the place for posting RESULTS to statistical analyses and simulations; an article on the subject should talk about how Simulations are useful, and how they can be performed, with at most one or two examples. If you wish to actually showcase some simulations, this is not the place to do so; what you CAN do is create a thread on Salvation or elsewhere, and link to it in the footnote section of the Simulation article.

Please make these changes soon.VestDan 09:33, 10 January 2007 (CST)