Talk:Case: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>BarGamer (New answer from Mark Rosewater's Blogatog) |
>RivalRowan No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==To Solve, or not to solve== | |||
You can solve Cases on a future turn. Source: Mark Rosewater's Blogatog [[User:BarGamer|BarGamer]] ([[User talk:BarGamer|talk]]) 01:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC) | You can solve Cases on a future turn. Source: Mark Rosewater's Blogatog [[User:BarGamer|BarGamer]] ([[User talk:BarGamer|talk]]) 01:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
:Yep, that is correct. The cards say this in the reminder text but I can see how the person asking the question to Mark is getting sucked into a nonsense argument. Thanks for adding it to the article. I've fixed up the reference and just re-worded the ruling so it explains/implies why this is the case. -- [[User:RivalRowan|RivalRowan]] ([[User talk:RivalRowan|talk]]) 10:05, 28 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:05, 28 January 2024
To Solve, or not to solve
You can solve Cases on a future turn. Source: Mark Rosewater's Blogatog BarGamer (talk) 01:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yep, that is correct. The cards say this in the reminder text but I can see how the person asking the question to Mark is getting sucked into a nonsense argument. Thanks for adding it to the article. I've fixed up the reference and just re-worded the ruling so it explains/implies why this is the case. -- RivalRowan (talk) 10:05, 28 January 2024 (UTC)