Talk:Alpha: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
(Trademark vs Copyright)
(Created page with "Your definition of mirrored pairs is EXTREMELY loose.... Black Knight / White Knight is DEFINITELY a mirrored pair, but Gaea's Liege and Cyclopean tomb? Fear and Invisibility...")
Line 1: Line 1:
== Trademark vs Copyright ==
Your definition of mirrored pairs is EXTREMELY loose.... Black Knight / White Knight is DEFINITELY a mirrored pair, but Gaea's Liege and Cyclopean tomb?  Fear and Invisibility?  Come on...  I don't see the "mirrored" aspect of it.  In that case any vanilla creature is a mirror or cycle if it functionally exists in 2 or more colors, which is not really a mirror/unfinished cycle (i.e. by design).
 
Can people PLEAE stop reverting
 
"Magic: The Gathering received its "The Gathering" subtitle for two reasons. First, "Magic" was thought to be too generic a name to trademark."
 
back to
 
"Magic: The Gathering received its "The Gathering" subtitle for two reasons. First, "Magic" was thought to be too generic a name to copyright."?
 
NAMES CAN NOT BE COPYRIGHTED, THEY CAN ONLY BE TRADEMARKED [RTFL [read the [bleeping] law]].  THAT'S WHY I removed the word "copyrighted" from that sentence and replaced it with "trademarked" TWICE.

Revision as of 23:01, 21 March 2019

Your definition of mirrored pairs is EXTREMELY loose.... Black Knight / White Knight is DEFINITELY a mirrored pair, but Gaea's Liege and Cyclopean tomb? Fear and Invisibility? Come on... I don't see the "mirrored" aspect of it. In that case any vanilla creature is a mirror or cycle if it functionally exists in 2 or more colors, which is not really a mirror/unfinished cycle (i.e. by design).

Retrieved from "https://mtg.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Alpha&oldid=320214"