Talk:Angel: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
>@DeletedUser40573538
(question about fallen angels)
 
>Hunterofsalvation
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== About fallen angels ==
== About fallen angels ==
This is mostly my curiosity. I always thought that the <c>Fallen Angel</c>'s type should be "demon". According to tradition, fallen angels and demons are absolutely the same. Also, traditional angels and demons are genderless spirits, but in Magic they have a female appearance. I am sure many people asked themselves the same questions. <br>Is it worth mentioning this anywhere on the page? Maybe a line like "Angels in Magic are different from traditional angels"? --[[User:Abacos|Abacos]] ([[User talk:Abacos|talk]]) 14:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
This is mostly my curiosity. I always thought that the <c>Fallen Angel</c>'s type should be "demon". According to tradition, fallen angels and demons are absolutely the same. Also, traditional angels and demons are genderless spirits, but in Magic they have a female appearance. I am sure many people asked themselves the same questions. <br>Is it worth mentioning this anywhere on the page? Maybe a line like "Angels in Magic are different from traditional angels"? --[[User:Abacos|Abacos]] ([[User talk:Abacos|talk]]) 14:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
* I think it's worth adding it as an obeservation. Go ahead. --[[User:Hunterofsalvation|Hunter]] ([[User talk:Hunterofsalvation|talk]]) 16:08, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:08, 9 November 2016

About fallen angels

This is mostly my curiosity. I always thought that the Fallen Angel's type should be "demon". According to tradition, fallen angels and demons are absolutely the same. Also, traditional angels and demons are genderless spirits, but in Magic they have a female appearance. I am sure many people asked themselves the same questions.
Is it worth mentioning this anywhere on the page? Maybe a line like "Angels in Magic are different from traditional angels"? --Abacos (talk) 14:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

  • I think it's worth adding it as an obeservation. Go ahead. --Hunter (talk) 16:08, 9 November 2016 (UTC)