Talk:Mark Rosewater: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Sene (Created page with "==Non-encyclopedic content== The "Miscellaneous" section seems a bit off to me. "Batshit insane"..? Do we have real sources for that? "He made an ass of himself"? This sort of...") |
>Corveroth |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Non-encyclopedic content== | ==Non-encyclopedic content== | ||
The "Miscellaneous" section seems a bit off to me. "Batshit insane"..? Do we have real sources for that? "He made an ass of himself"? This sort of thing seems like it doesn't belong on the Wiki at all. --[[User:SeneMTGSalvation|Sene]] ([[User talk:SeneMTGSalvation|talk]]) 21:39, 6 October 2015 (UTC) | The "Miscellaneous" section seems a bit off to me. "Batshit insane"..? Do we have real sources for that? "He made an ass of himself"? This sort of thing seems like it doesn't belong on the Wiki at all. --[[User:SeneMTGSalvation|Sene]] ([[User talk:SeneMTGSalvation|talk]]) 21:39, 6 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
: I'm more disturbed by the fact that that content was part of the initial commit and hasn't been touched since. The "batshit" comment should probably go, but it might be reasonable to keep the Unhinged note (perhaps in quotes to make clear that it's a riff on the idiom, rather than an editor's valuation), especially if we can find any coverage of the event that explicitly made that joke. --[[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 03:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:46, 7 October 2015
Non-encyclopedic content
The "Miscellaneous" section seems a bit off to me. "Batshit insane"..? Do we have real sources for that? "He made an ass of himself"? This sort of thing seems like it doesn't belong on the Wiki at all. --Sene (talk) 21:39, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- I'm more disturbed by the fact that that content was part of the initial commit and hasn't been touched since. The "batshit" comment should probably go, but it might be reasonable to keep the Unhinged note (perhaps in quotes to make clear that it's a riff on the idiom, rather than an editor's valuation), especially if we can find any coverage of the event that explicitly made that joke. --Corveroth (talk) 03:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)