Talk:Battle for Zendikar/Card comparisons

Noteworthiness

Is Endless One a sufficiently noteworthy card to warrant its own article(s)? If not, and its importance stems solely from being strictly better than many other cards, I think this page should be a subpage of the Battle for Zendikar article, where that fact is noted, e.g. Battle for Zendikar/Cards strictly worse than Endless One. --Corveroth (talk) 22:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

I certainly raised my eyebrows when I saw this article, but opted not to comment, seeing as this is not the part of the Wiki that I normally concern myself with, and I don't want to step on toes. But yeah, my opinion would be that this does not warrant its own article. --Sene (talk) 23:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

I think the content is fine, it's just not worthy of being a separate page. It's lengthy enough that it shouldn't be in the main article, perhaps, and that's what a subpage is for. --Corveroth (talk) 23:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

I Propose to make a subpage Battle for Zendikar/Card comparisons under category trivia. Leave the functional reprints on the main page and move all the stictly better / worse things to that subpage. It was getting out of hand anyway. --Hunter (talk) 02:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Might be good practice, in general, for the large list-style sections on set articles. Whether we adopt that in the future or not, I agree for this case. --Corveroth (talk) 02:34, 24 September 2015 (UTC)