Talk:Renown: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
>Corveroth
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
I believe this sentence seriously needs to be restructured. I'd do it myself if I could understand what it was supposed to mean.
I believe this sentence seriously needs to be restructured. I'd do it myself if I could understand what it was supposed to mean.
-[Unregistered] 16:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
-[Unregistered] 16:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  Actually, FiXT. [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=74317 Blah].
:Actually, FiXT. [http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=74317 Blah].
:: At first glance, I'd simply revert that, because the original sentence is a direct quote from the rules for Renown (see rule 702.111b just below). However, I agree that it's not the most plain-English phrasing, so let's try something a bit different. --[[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 17:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:37, 2 September 2015

“Renowned is a designation that has no rules meaning other than to act as a marker that the renown ability and other spells and abilities can identify.”

I believe this sentence seriously needs to be restructured. I'd do it myself if I could understand what it was supposed to mean. -[Unregistered] 16:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Actually, FiXT. Blah.
At first glance, I'd simply revert that, because the original sentence is a direct quote from the rules for Renown (see rule 702.111b just below). However, I agree that it's not the most plain-English phrasing, so let's try something a bit different. --Corveroth (talk) 17:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)