Talk:Fat Stack: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>KingSupernova mNo edit summary |
>Corveroth No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is it worth it to have a page for this format? No one seems to have come up with a real set of rules, people just make it up as they go. [[User:KingSupernova|KingSupernova]] ([[User talk:KingSupernova|talk]]) 02:03, 14 May 2015 (UTC) | Is it worth it to have a page for this format? No one seems to have come up with a real set of rules, people just make it up as they go. [[User:KingSupernova|KingSupernova]] ([[User talk:KingSupernova|talk]]) 02:03, 14 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
: The lack of any source outside of the linked Wizards ''archive'' page makes me wonder if this is really [//wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability notable]. Is there any evidence of the format being discussed on community sites? Otherwise, this may simply be something that Wizards observed via market research or hearsay and reported as a format at an ''unknown time in the past''. If that is the case, this page can probably go. [[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 04:38, 14 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:38, 14 May 2015
Is it worth it to have a page for this format? No one seems to have come up with a real set of rules, people just make it up as they go. KingSupernova (talk) 02:03, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- The lack of any source outside of the linked Wizards archive page makes me wonder if this is really notable. Is there any evidence of the format being discussed on community sites? Otherwise, this may simply be something that Wizards observed via market research or hearsay and reported as a format at an unknown time in the past. If that is the case, this page can probably go. Corveroth (talk) 04:38, 14 May 2015 (UTC)