Talk:Hideaway: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
>@DeletedUser40397020
(why one of the unsourced rulings is dubious)
 
>Jerodasst
(→‎Rulings: Yeah)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Rulings ==
== Rulings ==
The ruling saying "no one can look at the exiled card" seems dubious, due to a change in how it works: the static ability that lets some players look at the exiled card is on the exiled card, rather than on the card that has hideaway. That ability is granted by the triggered ability part of hideaway: once the ability resolves, the card has the ability and it's irrelevant what happens to the hideaway land subsequently. [[User:Thrawcheld|Thrawcheld]] ([[User talk:Thrawcheld|talk]]) 00:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
The ruling saying "no one can look at the exiled card" seems dubious, due to a change in how it works: the static ability that lets some players look at the exiled card is on the exiled card, rather than on the card that has hideaway. That ability is granted by the triggered ability part of hideaway: once the ability resolves, the card has the ability and it's irrelevant what happens to the hideaway land subsequently. [[User:Thrawcheld|Thrawcheld]] ([[User talk:Thrawcheld|talk]]) 00:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
:Agreed. In the absence of any responses or rulings that I can find on this, I'm taking it out.[[User:Jerodasst|Jerodasst]] ([[User talk:Jerodasst|talk]]) 05:25, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:25, 11 September 2019

Rulings

The ruling saying "no one can look at the exiled card" seems dubious, due to a change in how it works: the static ability that lets some players look at the exiled card is on the exiled card, rather than on the card that has hideaway. That ability is granted by the triggered ability part of hideaway: once the ability resolves, the card has the ability and it's irrelevant what happens to the hideaway land subsequently. Thrawcheld (talk) 00:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Agreed. In the absence of any responses or rulings that I can find on this, I'm taking it out.Jerodasst (talk) 05:25, 11 September 2019 (UTC)