Talk:Duel Decks

I seem to be ignored on the forums and ignored on the wiki so I'll ask in both places.

After merging 11+ articles into one does everyone think it looks better as one long article?

I have my reservations about one long article and prefer the individual entries. --GeoMike (talk) 06:26, 7 November 2012 (EST)

You're right. I prefer the individual entries as well. I don't see the point of the merging, it's against the nature of a wiki (just like moving entries to categories) --Hunter61 (talk) 07:09, 7 November 2012 (EST)

Normally, I'd be all for separate articles and articles separate from categories.

... so, I suppose we shouldn't merge minor, supporting, and other characters into a list of character and we shouldn't even have lists of characters at all, even if it might, you know, facilitate finding all of the characters associated with storylines?

Also, I suppose we shouldn't bother with more precisely categorising characters and the like according to their spot in the storylines and the blocks; rather, we should rely on, and cause further bloat, upon a superfluous number of categories. --Magic Mage (talk!) 08:18, 7 November 2012 (EST)

On the other wiki [www.wikipedia.com], they have individual entries for each Duel Decks set. Why can't we? Are we running out of article spaces? --GeoMike (talk) 19:37, 8 November 2012 (EST)

Lol what are you talking about? Aren't the Duel Decks except for the ones WotC released as jokes on their own pages? Color me confused! --Kraken Chowder 101 (talk) 03:30, 9 November 2012 (EST)

Please replace the April Fools DD section with links. Ktnx. Kraken Chowder 101 (talk) 03:38, 9 November 2012 (EST)