Talk:Duel Decks: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Hunterofsalvation No edit summary |
>@legacy41915546 mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:You're right. I prefer the individual entries as well. I don't see the point of the merging, it's against the nature of a wiki (just like moving entries to categories) --[[User:Hunter61|Hunter61]] ([[User talk:Hunter61|talk]]) 07:09, 7 November 2012 (EST) | :You're right. I prefer the individual entries as well. I don't see the point of the merging, it's against the nature of a wiki (just like moving entries to categories) --[[User:Hunter61|Hunter61]] ([[User talk:Hunter61|talk]]) 07:09, 7 November 2012 (EST) | ||
::Normally, I'd be all for separate articles and articles separate from categories. | |||
::... so, I suppose we shouldn't merge minor, supporting, and other characters into a list of character and we shouldn't even have lists of characters at all, even if it might, you know, facilitate finding all of the characters associated with storylines? | |||
::Also, I suppose we shouldn't bother with more precisely categorising characters and the like according to their spot in the storylines and the blocks; rather, we should rely on, and cause further bloat, upon a superfluous number of categories. --[[User:Magic Mage|<font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">agic</font> <font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">age</font>]] ([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|<font color="red">talk!</font>]]) 08:18, 7 November 2012 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 13:18, 7 November 2012
I seem to be ignored on the forums and ignored on the wiki so I'll ask in both places.
After merging 11+ articles into one does everyone think it looks better as one long article?
I have my reservations about one long article and prefer the individual entries. --GeoMike (talk) 06:26, 7 November 2012 (EST)
- You're right. I prefer the individual entries as well. I don't see the point of the merging, it's against the nature of a wiki (just like moving entries to categories) --Hunter61 (talk) 07:09, 7 November 2012 (EST)
- Normally, I'd be all for separate articles and articles separate from categories.
- ... so, I suppose we shouldn't merge minor, supporting, and other characters into a list of character and we shouldn't even have lists of characters at all, even if it might, you know, facilitate finding all of the characters associated with storylines?
- Also, I suppose we shouldn't bother with more precisely categorising characters and the like according to their spot in the storylines and the blocks; rather, we should rely on, and cause further bloat, upon a superfluous number of categories. --Magic Mage (talk!) 08:18, 7 November 2012 (EST)