Talk:Counter (marker)/Full List: Difference between revisions
>Ten19 mNo edit summary |
>Corveroth No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: I think that should be [[User:LegacymtgsalvationUser1033|GeoMike]]'s call. It's his baby. --[[User:LegacymtgsalvationUser620|Hunter]] ([[User talk:LegacymtgsalvationUser620|talk]]) 04:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC) | : I think that should be [[User:LegacymtgsalvationUser1033|GeoMike]]'s call. It's his baby. --[[User:LegacymtgsalvationUser620|Hunter]] ([[User talk:LegacymtgsalvationUser620|talk]]) 04:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
:: I've actually been toying with rearranging this page to be more like the [[Token/Full_List|Full List of Tokens Table]], where the counters are sortable alphabetically, and I still think this would be the better approach. Even with Corveroth's tidy version, it's still not particularly organized and hard to navigate. I'd be happy to throw something together to demonstrate. --[[User:Ten19|Ten19]] ([[User talk:Ten19|talk]]) 05:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC) | :: I've actually been toying with rearranging this page to be more like the [[Token/Full_List|Full List of Tokens Table]], where the counters are sortable alphabetically, and I still think this would be the better approach. Even with Corveroth's tidy version, it's still not particularly organized and hard to navigate. I'd be happy to throw something together to demonstrate. --[[User:Ten19|Ten19]] ([[User talk:Ten19|talk]]) 05:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
::: I'd ask, what is there to sort? I think that trying to reproduce here an exhaustive list of any large set of cards is fairly pointless. The odds of missing one or more cards grow rapidly (there were something like 200 fewer +1/+1 counter cards on the original page than in the Gatherer search), we have no tools to help users sort through those cards based on additional criteria (as Gatherer would), and because we lack even mouseover previews, users would need to navigate away from the wiki for additional information no matter how we present the set. | |||
::: That was the underlying set of assumptions behind my redesign. Our purpose here should be to list the counter types (or token types, or whatever other interesting quality of cards), and direct the user to a more appropriate tool for further information, whether that be magiccards.info, Gatherer, or some other site. For very small sets of cards, simple uniqueness may be sufficient to make an enumeration of those cards noteworthy, but for larger sets, attempts at listing are error-prone, detrimental to accessibility, and require excessive amounts of maintenance. [[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 18:10, 7 May 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:10, 7 May 2015
Magnificent job! --Hunter61 15:13, 27 August 2011 (EDT)
- Thanks :) You've been doing great work on all of the races. --GeoMike 15:30, 27 August 2011 (EDT)
There is a mistake in where Lesser Werewolf is placed. It is listed under -1/-0 counters, but actually gives -0/-1 counters (giving itself -1/-0 until end of turn). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HamsterBoo (talk • contribs) 23 September 2012.
I'd like to propose that this page be reduced dramatically and replaced with something like this demo. I think that this list, as it stands, has ballooned to include a great deal of un-noteworthy trivia, and is of such length that it deters browsing. The proposed replacement is currently generated by a Lua script running on this page's wikitext, and further maintenance will require little more than running a modified version of that script against a list of all known counter types. Due to the scale of this edit, I do want to give notice on this page before initiating it. Corveroth (talk) 00:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- I think that should be GeoMike's call. It's his baby. --Hunter (talk) 04:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- I've actually been toying with rearranging this page to be more like the Full List of Tokens Table, where the counters are sortable alphabetically, and I still think this would be the better approach. Even with Corveroth's tidy version, it's still not particularly organized and hard to navigate. I'd be happy to throw something together to demonstrate. --Ten19 (talk) 05:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- I'd ask, what is there to sort? I think that trying to reproduce here an exhaustive list of any large set of cards is fairly pointless. The odds of missing one or more cards grow rapidly (there were something like 200 fewer +1/+1 counter cards on the original page than in the Gatherer search), we have no tools to help users sort through those cards based on additional criteria (as Gatherer would), and because we lack even mouseover previews, users would need to navigate away from the wiki for additional information no matter how we present the set.
- That was the underlying set of assumptions behind my redesign. Our purpose here should be to list the counter types (or token types, or whatever other interesting quality of cards), and direct the user to a more appropriate tool for further information, whether that be magiccards.info, Gatherer, or some other site. For very small sets of cards, simple uniqueness may be sufficient to make an enumeration of those cards noteworthy, but for larger sets, attempts at listing are error-prone, detrimental to accessibility, and require excessive amounts of maintenance. Corveroth (talk) 18:10, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- I've actually been toying with rearranging this page to be more like the Full List of Tokens Table, where the counters are sortable alphabetically, and I still think this would be the better approach. Even with Corveroth's tidy version, it's still not particularly organized and hard to navigate. I'd be happy to throw something together to demonstrate. --Ten19 (talk) 05:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC)