Talk:Wrath effect: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
>@legacy41915546
m (Explanation for edits.)
>@legacy41915546
m (Sign.)
Line 1: Line 1:
Does <c>Destructive Force</c> count as a Wrath effect? {{-}} [[User:Gamma-Mage|Γ-Mage]] 05:31, 5 November 2010 (EDT)
Does <c>Destructive Force</c> count as a Wrath effect? {{-}} [[User:Gamma-Mage|Γ-Mage]] 05:31, 5 November 2010 (EDT)


:I do not believe that it does, as it is contingent on the toughness of the creatures. Wrath effects simply remove creatures in play.
:I do not believe that it does (count as a Wrath effect), as it is contingent on the toughness of the creatures. Wrath effects simply remove creatures in play. --[[User:Magic Mage|<font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">agic</font> <font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">age</font>]] ([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|<font color="red">talk!</font>]]) 14:43, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


==I hope you don't mind==
==I hope you don't mind==

Revision as of 14:43, 20 January 2013

Does Destructive Force count as a Wrath effect? — Γ-Mage 05:31, 5 November 2010 (EDT)

I do not believe that it does (count as a Wrath effect), as it is contingent on the toughness of the creatures. Wrath effects simply remove creatures in play. --Magic Mage (talk!) 14:43, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind

These edits.

I rewrote the lead section as it contained, while interesting, irrelevant trivia on the reprint history of WoG. Furthermore, the lead failed to impart the fact that Wrath effects are, at their most fundamental, effects of spells, not spells themselves. Per the prior definition, Kederekt Leviathan did not exactly qualify as a Wrath effect, as, technically, the CitP/EtB effect is the doer. This point is made more clear with the enchantments and artifacts that are activated to create the Wrath, or Wrath effect.

I hope that this is understandable, palatable, and even appreciated. If you have objections to this, if you could raise them and explain, that'd be great. Thanks. --Magic Mage (talk!) 14:42, 20 January 2013 (UTC)