Category talk:Tournament decks: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>@legacy41915328 (→Split) |
>@legacy41915328 No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Is Madness viable currently? Has it not been completely metagamed out? [[User:QmunkE|QmunkE]] 02:59, 6 April 2006 (CDT) | Is Madness viable currently? Has it not been completely metagamed out? [[User:QmunkE|QmunkE]] 02:59, 6 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
What in the world is Hypnotic Control? I'm trying to help flesh out some of the standard decks but I've never heard of that one. Is it suppose to be BW Control? [[User:Shadowin]] | What in the world is Hypnotic Control? I'm trying to help flesh out some of the standard decks but I've never heard of that one. Is it suppose to be BW Control? --[[User:Shadowin|Shadowin]] 17:50, 6 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:50, 6 April 2006
Split
I believe that we need to split decks bewteen current competive decks and past decks. As is we have older decks missed in and it makes it a bad source of information unless we specify.User:SorryGuy
- Agreed, what we have now will be current, and we will add on an "Old Decks" sections. I didn't even think of this issue, glad you noticed.Voice of AllTalk 16:50, 15 December 2005 (CST)
Is Madness viable currently? Has it not been completely metagamed out? QmunkE 02:59, 6 April 2006 (CDT)
What in the world is Hypnotic Control? I'm trying to help flesh out some of the standard decks but I've never heard of that one. Is it suppose to be BW Control? --Shadowin 17:50, 6 April 2006 (CDT)