Talk:Urza: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
im>Sneakyhomunculus
No edit summary
im>RMS Oceanic
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
Lol, I had forgotten I had left it like this, but really, writing an accurate, encyclopedic entry on Urza would take FOREVER. I'm sure someone will get to it, heh. [[User:VestDan|VestDan]] 19:29, 5 April 2006 (CDT)
Lol, I had forgotten I had left it like this, but really, writing an accurate, encyclopedic entry on Urza would take FOREVER. I'm sure someone will get to it, heh. [[User:VestDan|VestDan]] 19:29, 5 April 2006 (CDT)


RMSOceanic is finally making this an actual article. That's great, but I'm kinda sad to see the old version go... heh. Thanks, Oceanic![[User:VestDan|VestDan]] 16:09, 8 April 2006 (CDT)
RMS Oceanic is finally making this an actual article. That's great, but I'm kinda sad to see the old version go... heh. Thanks, Oceanic![[User:VestDan|VestDan]] 16:09, 8 April 2006 (CDT)


I agree. It's good that the article is finally written, but the old version was so good. :D [[User:Sneakyhomunculus|Sneakyhomunculus]] 10:24, 10 April 2006 (CDT)
I agree. It's good that the article is finally written, but the old version was so good. :D [[User:Sneakyhomunculus|Sneakyhomunculus]] 10:24, 10 April 2006 (CDT)
Thanks for the props! For those who miss the old version, I hid the code for it in invisible comments (< ! - -), in case anybody needed to use it for some reason. [[User:RMS Oceanic|RMS Oceanic]] 22:14, 10 April 2006 (BST)

Revision as of 21:15, 10 April 2006

Best article ever! :D

Sneakyhomunculus 12:51, 16 January 2006 (CST)

This is such a great read. -- "GWiZ665 16:24, 5 April 2006 (CDT)"

Lol, I had forgotten I had left it like this, but really, writing an accurate, encyclopedic entry on Urza would take FOREVER. I'm sure someone will get to it, heh. VestDan 19:29, 5 April 2006 (CDT)

RMS Oceanic is finally making this an actual article. That's great, but I'm kinda sad to see the old version go... heh. Thanks, Oceanic!VestDan 16:09, 8 April 2006 (CDT)

I agree. It's good that the article is finally written, but the old version was so good. :D Sneakyhomunculus 10:24, 10 April 2006 (CDT)

Thanks for the props! For those who miss the old version, I hid the code for it in invisible comments (< ! - -), in case anybody needed to use it for some reason. RMS Oceanic 22:14, 10 April 2006 (BST)