Template talk:Featured article: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
>LegacymtgsalvationUser1033
No edit summary
(→‎...WorldwakeR?: new section)
Line 29: Line 29:
Also, it sorta seems incongruous to have the feature article, something of perfection, I guess, to also be the article to improve. <sup>M</sup><sub>M</sub> <sup>([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|talk!]])</sup> 16:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Also, it sorta seems incongruous to have the feature article, something of perfection, I guess, to also be the article to improve. <sup>M</sup><sub>M</sub> <sup>([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|talk!]])</sup> 16:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
:The article to improve is the novel or am I missing something. --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 18:09, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
:The article to improve is the novel or am I missing something. --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 18:09, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
== ...WorldwakeR? ==
Worldwake'''R'''? >_> This page is protected, so I can't fix that amusing typo.

Revision as of 03:10, 12 February 2010

How we will choose next articles of the week? (I completely agree on this one). --MORT (T) 20:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

There is no official way to choose. Until we come up with a way, I say any administrator can choose any worth-while topic. --GeoMike 20:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Will work till all of us want something else ;-). We should create some page where we could propose and vote for articles. --MORT (T) 21:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Page created at Template:Featarticle/Proposals --GeoMike 01:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Proposals are not coming in very often, so the last 2 feature articles have stuck around for 2 weeks each. --GeoMike 13:06, 19 May 2008 (PDT)
What exactly is the success of this anyway? I think it could work fine if it were Article to Improve of the Month. :-/ MM (talk!) 01:21, 16 August 2008 (EDT)
Honestly, the only article that I've seen with more then 1 edit during the week when it was article of the week to improve was Magic: The Gathering which looks a lot better then what it was before it was article of the week to improve but still needs work. --GeoMike 01:45, 16 August 2008 (EDT)
Haha, we all know why this is the case; no. of editors, editor mentality. What could get more people on this, if anything (I'm not going to be all that optimistic about this anymore, the hope that more will join in improving the wiki, sorry)? Maybe... there's custom titles to wiki editors (on the MTGS forums)? MM (talk!) 06:34, 16 August 2008 (EDT)
The editors we do have each have their specialities; more or less. They may or may not overlap. sighsssssssssss I need a Mt Dew --GeoMike 15:32, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

Transparency

Anyone know how to make the images transparent? Should they be, anyway? Right now, I see a pixellated Legends logo on the main page, that's all. =p

P.S. I love Mountain Dew. It's got caffeine in it, too; which is both beneficial and detrimental, and I never knew it had that stuff in it. =/ MM (talk!) 08:12, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Indentation

I like it - good idea :) --GeoMike 23:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

thx :) . Oracle of Truth 00:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Feature article/feature article to improve discussion

Um... where shoudl this be done?

Also, it sorta seems incongruous to have the feature article, something of perfection, I guess, to also be the article to improve. MM (talk!) 16:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

The article to improve is the novel or am I missing something. --GeoMike 18:09, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

...WorldwakeR?

WorldwakeR? >_> This page is protected, so I can't fix that amusing typo.