Template talk:Featured article: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>LegacymtgsalvationUser1033 No edit summary |
>@legacy41915546 No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::::Honestly, the only article that I've seen with more then 1 edit during the week when it was article of the week to improve was [[Magic: The Gathering]] which looks a lot better then what it was before it was article of the week to improve but still needs work. --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 01:45, 16 August 2008 (EDT) | :::::Honestly, the only article that I've seen with more then 1 edit during the week when it was article of the week to improve was [[Magic: The Gathering]] which looks a lot better then what it was before it was article of the week to improve but still needs work. --[[User:GeoMike|GeoMike]] 01:45, 16 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
::::Haha, we all know why this is the case; no. of editors, editor mentality. What could get more people on this, ''if anything'' (I'm not going to be all that optimistic about this anymore, the hope that more will join in improving the wiki, sorry)? Maybe... there's custom titles to wiki editors (on the MTGS forums)? <small>'''[[User:Magic Mage|<sup>M</sup><sub>M</sub>]]''' '''<sup>([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|talk!]])</sup>'''</small> 06:34, 16 August 2008 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:34, 16 August 2008
How we will choose next articles of the week? (I completely agree on this one). --MORT (T) 20:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- There is no official way to choose. Until we come up with a way, I say any administrator can choose any worth-while topic. --GeoMike 20:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Will work till all of us want something else ;-). We should create some page where we could propose and vote for articles. --MORT (T) 21:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Page created at Template:Featarticle/Proposals --GeoMike 01:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Will work till all of us want something else ;-). We should create some page where we could propose and vote for articles. --MORT (T) 21:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Proposals are not coming in very often, so the last 2 feature articles have stuck around for 2 weeks each. --GeoMike 13:06, 19 May 2008 (PDT)
- Honestly, the only article that I've seen with more then 1 edit during the week when it was article of the week to improve was Magic: The Gathering which looks a lot better then what it was before it was article of the week to improve but still needs work. --GeoMike 01:45, 16 August 2008 (EDT)
- Haha, we all know why this is the case; no. of editors, editor mentality. What could get more people on this, if anything (I'm not going to be all that optimistic about this anymore, the hope that more will join in improving the wiki, sorry)? Maybe... there's custom titles to wiki editors (on the MTGS forums)? MM (talk!) 06:34, 16 August 2008 (EDT)