Standard RGW Aggro Zoo deck: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
im>Sneakyhomunculus
m (Added stub)
>@legacy41915243
(JS: Replacing text "<BR>" with "")
Line 6: Line 6:


Zoo simply demolishes [[Owling Mine]], and has fairly good matchups versus both aggressive and controlling strategies.  {{c|Umezawa's Jitte and {{c|Hunted Wumpus}} in the sideboard bolster [[Aggro deck|Aggro]] matchups, and {{c|Giant Solifuge}} and {{c|Flames of the Blood Hand}} bolster [[Control deck|Control]] matchups.  {{c|Guerilla Tactics}} is excellent against the floods of Orzhov Aggro that were in Honolulu, and {{c|Tin-Street Hooligan provides some additional utility.  Does anyone else think it amusing that an English player had Hooligans in his deck?
Zoo simply demolishes [[Owling Mine]], and has fairly good matchups versus both aggressive and controlling strategies.  {{c|Umezawa's Jitte and {{c|Hunted Wumpus}} in the sideboard bolster [[Aggro deck|Aggro]] matchups, and {{c|Giant Solifuge}} and {{c|Flames of the Blood Hand}} bolster [[Control deck|Control]] matchups.  {{c|Guerilla Tactics}} is excellent against the floods of Orzhov Aggro that were in Honolulu, and {{c|Tin-Street Hooligan provides some additional utility.  Does anyone else think it amusing that an English player had Hooligans in his deck?
<BR><BR>
<deck title="Recurring Survival">
'''Zoo'''<BR>
 
4 Savannah Lions<BR>
'''Zoo'''
4 Isamaru, Hound of Konda<BR>
4 Savannah Lions
4 Kird Ape<BR>
4 Isamaru, Hound of Konda
4 Watchwolf<BR>
4 Kird Ape
3 Kami of Ancient Law<BR>
4 Watchwolf
3 Burning-Tree Shaman<BR>
3 Kami of Ancient Law
<BR>
3 Burning-Tree Shaman
4 Char<BR>
 
4 Lightning Helix<BR>
4 Char
3 Flames of the Blood Hand<BR>
4 Lightning Helix
3 Shock<BR>
3 Flames of the Blood Hand
<BR>
3 Shock
4 Sacred Foundry<BR>
 
4 Battlefield Forge<BR>
4 Sacred Foundry
4 Temple Garden<BR>
4 Battlefield Forge
4 Stomping Ground<BR>
4 Temple Garden
2 Forest<BR>
4 Stomping Ground
1 Eiganjo Castle<BR>
2 Forest
1 Plains<BR>
1 Eiganjo Castle
1 Karplusan Forest<BR>
1 Plains
1 Brushland<BR>
1 Karplusan Forest
<BR>
1 Brushland
<BR>
 
4 Umezawa's Jitte<BR>
 
3 Hunted Wumpus<BR>
4 Umezawa's Jitte
3 Guerilla Tactics<BR>
3 Hunted Wumpus
2 Giant Solifuge<BR>
3 Guerilla Tactics
2 Tin-Street Hooligan<BR>
2 Giant Solifuge
2 Tin-Street Hooligan
1 Flames of the Blood Hand
1 Flames of the Blood Hand
<BR>
</deck>
<BR>
{{Deck-stub}}[[Category:Tournament Decks]]
{{Deck-stub}}[[Category:Tournament Decks]]

Revision as of 21:22, 11 April 2006

Zoo has recently seen quite a bit of success on the Pro Tour scene, placing 2nd at Pro Tour: Honolulu. It was piloted by the "cursed" Craig Jones. Zoo adopts an approach closer to the classic Sligh deck than anything else. Early 2-power one-drops ({C} and the dread White Weenie duo of {C} and {C}) are backed up by a powerful two drop ({C}). Interestingly enough, the deck does feature a three-drop permanent, {C}. More than likely the power of the Shaman gave him the slot over {C}, who would almost always be a 3-power two-drop, but lacks the killer triggered ability on the Shaman. In another interesting choice, Jones maindecked three {C}. Enchantments are becoming increasingly powerful and popular in Standard, so having maindeck ways to remove them is quite good. Having that ability wrapped up in a Bear is just gravy.

Like other Sligh style decks, most of the creatures exist to put the opponent in reach of burn, though Zoo's creatures generally stick around longer than most Sligh build's creatures. Zoo features the most powerful burn suite found in Standard today. {C}, {C}, {C}, and {C} are all featured, so there are a ton of both creature elimination, as well as player elimination options.

Zoo sacrifices some of the mana consistency of its cousin, Heezy Street. The mana base is heavy on non-basics, so it's very vulnerable to {C} (not to mention expensive as all get out).

Zoo simply demolishes Owling Mine, and has fairly good matchups versus both aggressive and controlling strategies. {{c|Umezawa's Jitte and {C} in the sideboard bolster Aggro matchups, and {C} and {C} bolster Control matchups. {C} is excellent against the floods of Orzhov Aggro that were in Honolulu, and {{c|Tin-Street Hooligan provides some additional utility. Does anyone else think it amusing that an English player had Hooligans in his deck?