Kaldheim/Card comparisons: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
>Neoheart
mNo edit summary
>BlackDiamondDragon
No edit summary
Line 33: Line 33:
*<c>Shackles of Treachery</c> is strictly better than <c>Act of Treason</c>.
*<c>Shackles of Treachery</c> is strictly better than <c>Act of Treason</c>.
*<c>Smashing Success</c> is strictly better than <c>Demolish</c>.
*<c>Smashing Success</c> is strictly better than <c>Demolish</c>.
*<c>Stalwart Valkyrie</c> is strictly better than <c>Assault Griffin</c>.
*<c>Struggle for Skemfar</c> is strictly better than <c>Hunt the Weak</c>.
*<c>Struggle for Skemfar</c> is strictly better than <c>Hunt the Weak</c>.
*<c>Usher of the Fallen</c> is strictly better than <c>Eager Cadet</c>, <c>Elite Vanguard</c>, <c>Expedition Envoy</c>, and <c>Savannah Lions</c>.
*<c>Usher of the Fallen</c> is strictly better than <c>Eager Cadet</c>, <c>Elite Vanguard</c>, <c>Expedition Envoy</c>, and <c>Savannah Lions</c>.
Line 46: Line 47:


==Strictly worse==
==Strictly worse==
*<c>Beskir Shieldmate</c> is strictly worse than <c>Martyr of Dusk</c> and <c>Tithe Taker</c>.
*<c>Elderleaf Mentor</c> is strictly worse than <c>Ambassador Oak</c>.
*<c>Elderleaf Mentor</c> is strictly worse than <c>Ambassador Oak</c>.
*<c>Feed the Serpent</c> is strictly worse than <c>Eat to Extinction</c> and <c>Vraska's Contempt</c>.
*<c>Feed the Serpent</c> is strictly worse than <c>Eat to Extinction</c> and <c>Vraska's Contempt</c>.

Revision as of 16:28, 21 January 2021

Kaldheim/Card comparisons
 
 
 
 

Cards from Kaldheim as compared to cards from earlier sets.

Strictly better

Set and theme boosters

Strictly worse