Talk:Dominaria

There are about 800 pages linking to this page. That's why I started a discussion --Hunter (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

I would have thought it better to have this page be Dominaria (Expansion) or Dominaria (Set), and leave the Dominaria article as the article about the plane, simply because of what you mention. Changing all those links to Dominaria (Plane) will be work. --Sene (talk) 15:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Fortunately, AWB automated >95% of it. No problem! --Corveroth (talk) 16:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Ah, excellent. Never mind then! --Sene (talk) 18:05, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Saga cycles

The list of cycles had one for "uncommon Saga enchantments", one of each color. But there are now at least two uncommon black sagas: Chainer's Torment and The Eldest Reborn. So what's going on here? Maybe a "cycle" of ten, two in each color? Maybe it's a cycle plus a one-off (if so, which do we consider part of the cycle)? Or we could be seeing a cycle where there is none. --BlackDiamondDragon (talk) 17:58, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Many cycles are created by design and some are spotted by the fans. I would assume they never went out of their way to actually create a Saga enchantment cycle at one rarity. There are 14 sagas in total at all colors from uncommon to mythic rare. - Yandere Sliver 18:05, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm not saying I'm against us naming a cycle. If we get five, with one of each color, at any given rarity, sure, call it a cycle. We can see once the set it fully spoiled. --BlackDiamondDragon (talk) 18:48, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Actually I 100% agree. All I wanted to say is we probably have 14 sagas and we can probably not identify single cycle among them. - Yandere Sliver 18:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Yup, two rare black ones now. There's probably a rare green one yet to come, but I think we can officially say no cycles. --BlackDiamondDragon (talk) 14:36, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Can you edit the Archetypes cycal to this. https://www.mtgsalvation.com/articles/49719-the-limited-archetypes-of-dominaria 86.24.219.202 20:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

I added the archetype cycle (with the uncommons). Not sure how to add sources though or if even necessary. Sources are your link above and this article on the motherboard by Marshall Sutcliff: https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/how-play-limited/whirlwind-tour-archetypes-dominaria-2018-04-24

DOM or DAR

I find many sources using DAR as a three-letter code for Dominaria. The WotC page linked in the Wiki doesn't have product information (anymore?) and there's just a Twitter hashtag #MTGDOM, which I don't think mean much. On the other hand, WotC has DAR has the code for the sealed events, which seems to pretty explicitly establish DOM is not the code. --Kumagoro42 (talk) 16:51, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

DOM is the code printed on the cards and used for the set symbol filename on Gatherer. With those two, and keeping in mind that the website team keeps screwing up set codes in articles and the card set archive, it's pretty safe to say that DOM is the correct code. —Fenhl 17:44, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

There's still something about the code. The DAR code is used on MTGA, and Game Director Chris Clay instructed the players to use it (as a search tool) with these words: "Dominaria (DAR) (...) And no, that isn't a typo - for Dominaria you will need to use the original three letter code DAR." So, DAR is "the original three letter code" then? Does this mean at some point they changed it? --Kumagoro42 (talk) 20:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Seems like it... Actually that sounds like something which could go in the trivia section. - Yandere Sliver 20:37, 4 October 2018 (UTC)