Talk:Storm Scale: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Yandere-sliver No edit summary |
>Corveroth No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::: Alright, what say you to that? I know the subentry system causes those rows to sort a little oddly when sorted by rating, but otherwise, I think it works alright. --[[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 03:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC) | ::: Alright, what say you to that? I know the subentry system causes those rows to sort a little oddly when sorted by rating, but otherwise, I think it works alright. --[[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 03:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::: It looks very cool. As you already mentioned, I would have expected that Bushido would sort under 8 (basically the main entry). However currently I don't really get why it sorts incorrectly. - [[User:Yanderesliver|Yandere Sliver]] [[File:H09 symbol.png|16px|link=User talk:Yanderesliver]] 04:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC) | :::: It looks very cool. As you already mentioned, I would have expected that Bushido would sort under 8 (basically the main entry). However currently I don't really get why it sorts incorrectly. - [[User:Yanderesliver|Yandere Sliver]] [[File:H09 symbol.png|16px|link=User talk:Yanderesliver]] 04:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::: Something about the sorting javascript doesn't handle it right. I'm not sure exactly what it is - whether it reads that row as "84", or "8\n4", or whatever, but it parses it as coming after 11... alphabetically, probably. The JS responsible is obfuscated and comes down from Curse anyways, so I can't change it. It comes down to a choice between having "subentries", as I'm calling them, as a part of the "main" row, which damages the sorting slightly; or having them as separate rows, which allows them to be sorted away from the main row. I favor the former, of course. --[[User:Corveroth|Corveroth]] ([[User talk:Corveroth|talk]]) 04:23, 28 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
==Storm Scale Articles== | ==Storm Scale Articles== |
Revision as of 04:23, 28 December 2016
qualifierX
I think it would be helpful to have something like:
entryX = Landwalk
qualifierX = Nonbasic
the have the link work with the entry and have the qualifier appear in parenthesis after the mechanic. But not today. Merry Christmas - Yandere Sliver 17:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Already planning something like this. --Corveroth (talk) 01:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, that edit wiped a few of the changes you made. I got it covered, just not tonight. --Corveroth (talk) 05:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Alright, what say you to that? I know the subentry system causes those rows to sort a little oddly when sorted by rating, but otherwise, I think it works alright. --Corveroth (talk) 03:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- It looks very cool. As you already mentioned, I would have expected that Bushido would sort under 8 (basically the main entry). However currently I don't really get why it sorts incorrectly. - Yandere Sliver 04:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- Something about the sorting javascript doesn't handle it right. I'm not sure exactly what it is - whether it reads that row as "84", or "8\n4", or whatever, but it parses it as coming after 11... alphabetically, probably. The JS responsible is obfuscated and comes down from Curse anyways, so I can't change it. It comes down to a choice between having "subentries", as I'm calling them, as a part of the "main" row, which damages the sorting slightly; or having them as separate rows, which allows them to be sorted away from the main row. I favor the former, of course. --Corveroth (talk) 04:23, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- It looks very cool. As you already mentioned, I would have expected that Bushido would sort under 8 (basically the main entry). However currently I don't really get why it sorts incorrectly. - Yandere Sliver 04:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- Alright, what say you to that? I know the subentry system causes those rows to sort a little oddly when sorted by rating, but otherwise, I think it works alright. --Corveroth (talk) 03:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, that edit wiped a few of the changes you made. I got it covered, just not tonight. --Corveroth (talk) 05:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Storm Scale Articles
What I just realized is that the articles from the wizard pages are missing:
- Yandere Sliver 17:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)