Playtest: Difference between revisions

From MTG Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
>Yandere-sliver
m (→‎Design: clean up)
>Yandere-sliver
m (→‎Design: clean up, replaced: cite web → WebRef (3))
Line 4: Line 4:


==Design==
==Design==
Playtest cards often have specific card codes, to make them recognisable for the playtesters.<ref>{{NewRef|making-magic/nuts-bolts-card-codes-2009-01-12|Nuts & Bolts: Card Codes|[[Mark Rosewater]]|January 12, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{NewRef|braincat-2008-03-04|Braincat|[[Magic Arcana]]|March 04, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{NewRef|latest-developments/playtest-cards-2016-12-02|Playtest Cards|[[Sam Stoddard]]|December 2, 2016}}</ref> They are highly confidential. In early 2006, Wizards of the Coast filed a lawsuit against Daron Rutter, a moderator from [[MTG Salvation]], for posting playtest cards for upcoming ''Magic: The Gathering'' card sets.<ref>{{cite web
Playtest cards often have specific card codes, to make them recognisable for the playtesters.<ref>{{NewRef|making-magic/nuts-bolts-card-codes-2009-01-12|Nuts & Bolts: Card Codes|[[Mark Rosewater]]|January 12, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{NewRef|braincat-2008-03-04|Braincat|[[Magic Arcana]]|March 04, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{NewRef|latest-developments/playtest-cards-2016-12-02|Playtest Cards|[[Sam Stoddard]]|December 2, 2016}}</ref> They are highly confidential. In early 2006, Wizards of the Coast filed a lawsuit against Daron Rutter, a moderator from [[MTG Salvation]], for posting playtest cards for upcoming ''Magic: The Gathering'' card sets.<ref>{{WebRef
| url = http://ww2.wizards.com/Company/Misc/Index.aspx?doc=pr_20060119a
| url = http://ww2.wizards.com/Company/Misc/Index.aspx?doc=pr_20060119a
| title = Wizards Of The Coast Takes Legal Action
| title = Wizards Of The Coast Takes Legal Action
Line 11: Line 11:
| publisher = Wizards of the Coast, Inc
| publisher = Wizards of the Coast, Inc
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
The lawsuit accused him of engaging in copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement, trade secret violation, unjust enrichment, and breach of contract.<ref>{{cite web
The lawsuit accused him of engaging in copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement, trade secret violation, unjust enrichment, and breach of contract.<ref>{{WebRef
| url = http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=32149
| url = http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=32149
| title = Wizards of the Coast vs. Daron Rutter: An Update
| title = Wizards of the Coast vs. Daron Rutter: An Update
Line 19: Line 19:
| date = 2006-02-18
| date = 2006-02-18
| publisher = MTGSalvation.com
| publisher = MTGSalvation.com
}}</ref> The case was settled out of court, and the terms of the settlement have been sealed.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> The case was settled out of court, and the terms of the settlement have been sealed.<ref>{{WebRef
| url = http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=36468
| url = http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=36468
| title = Wizards vs. rancored_elf: the Resolution
| title = Wizards vs. rancored_elf: the Resolution

Revision as of 02:33, 1 April 2019

Playtest card with cardcode

A playtest is the process by which individual cards, as in card design, or sets of cards, as in decks, are played to test the card or cards for design issues to establish a desired quality.[1][2]

Design

Playtest cards often have specific card codes, to make them recognisable for the playtesters.[3][4][5] They are highly confidential. In early 2006, Wizards of the Coast filed a lawsuit against Daron Rutter, a moderator from MTG Salvation, for posting playtest cards for upcoming Magic: The Gathering card sets.[6] The lawsuit accused him of engaging in copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement, trade secret violation, unjust enrichment, and breach of contract.[7] The case was settled out of court, and the terms of the settlement have been sealed.[8]

Deckbuilding

Deck playtesting involves testing a given deck against popular decks in a format's metagame and accordingly modifying the decklist, its main deck and its sideboard, to better deal with those decks.[9]

References

  1. Template:NewRef
  2. Template:NewRef
  3. Template:NewRef
  4. Template:NewRef
  5. Template:NewRef
  6. Wizards Of The Coast Takes Legal Action. Wizards of the Coast, Inc (2006-01-19). Retrieved on 2006-09-02.
  7. Wizards of the Coast vs. Daron Rutter: An Update. MTGSalvation.com (2006-02-18). Retrieved on 2006-09-02.
  8. Wizards vs. rancored_elf: the Resolution. MTGSalvation.com (2006-04-06). Retrieved on 2006-09-02.
  9. Template:NewRef

External links