Talk:Legends

I think that trivia information about packaging should be moved in the beginning. Furthermore I'd like to have information on packaging on every expansion: How it was packaged and what was included (like Legends rulecard).

Also all three Kobolds weren't functionally compatible. Crimson Kobolds and Crookshank Kobolds are, but Kobolds of Kher Keep are not as Rohgahh of Kher Keep gives them and not the others +2/+2.

You can edit articles, be bold :) --GeoMike 07:38, 6 November 2011 (EST)

Legends Hierarchy

"Please, log in and sign your edits. Then we can discuss "official" vs. "interpretation of official"."

The fact that i did not create an acount does not make my edits less valuable than yours. Check my contribution log if you need to be convinced that i'm taking this wiki seriously, but i feel i've earned the right not to justify myself.
In the official vs interpretation debate, the answer is simple: the family tree organisation is official because it's on the official Magic website. Your version, well, is just your version. Note that originally, there was a picture detailling the familly trees, but it, like many others, was lost when Wizards changed its website.

My main problem with your first revison of the family tree was this sentence:

"It was also proposed, instead of this simple hierarchy, a complex system of "family trees", where each one of the two-color legends is featured twice, just to make it look more complex."

This was purposefully insulting toward the original writer, an offcial Wizards contributor, just to make your own version seem better by comparison. I'll add that this is not the first time you used an arrogant and condescending tone to demean other peoples work (i.e, the Thopter page).

Since you've removed that line and restored the original wording, i won't waste my time fighting on the details of the presentation. Since the original infos are preserved, all is well and i consider the matter closed (i'll remind that if you that the original picture from the website is lost, meaning if you had actually removed the official version to replace it with your own, one of the last copy of the original Arcana post would have been destroyed). --78.203.253.117 10:44, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

IP editors are as valuable to the wiki as any account editor. I want to ask from a pure information perspective would you agree with the current presentation or would you say something is still missing here? - Yandere Sliver 16:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)