Talk:Legends: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:26, 6 November 2011

I think that trivia information about packaging should be moved in the beginning. Furthermore I'd like to have information on packaging on every expansion: How it was packaged and what was included (like Legends rulecard).

Also all three Kobolds weren't functionally compatible. Crimson Kobolds and Crookshank Kobolds are, but Kobolds of Kher Keep are not as Rohgahh of Kher Keep gives them and not the others +2/+2.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-"Steve Conard, lead designer of Legends, was a big fan of movies and named the cards Backdraft, Cocoon, Field of Dreams, Moat, Raging Bull, and The Abyss after movies. Two other cards, "Star Wars" and "Beaches," were cut in development."
+I think that trivia information about packaging should be moved in the beginning. Furthermore I'd like to have information on packaging on every expansion: How it was packaged and what was included (like Legends rulecard).
-I seem to recall this being an Arcana or Ask Wizards question, and I further seem to recall it being a joke. Could someone verify this perhaps? I mean, "Beaches" doesn't even SOUND like a card name. [[User:VestDan|VestDan]] 10:30, 3 July 2006 (CDT)
+Also all three Kobolds weren't functionally compatible. Crimson Kobolds and Crookshank Kobolds are, but Kobolds of Kher Keep are not as Rohgahh of Kher Keep gives them and not the others +2/+2.
-That is indeed its source. I don't recall it being called a joke, although it could simply be a coincidence. However, many early designers and developers used their own interests in naming and designing cards, including D&D characters, so I dont think this is beyond believeable, although it does appear to be arcana from April first, which i did not notice initially, so it could very well be a joke.
-~BAMooore 7/7/06

Talk:Legends: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:26, 6 November 2011

Navigation menu

Search