Talk:Jace Beleren: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>@legacy41915546 (:S) |
>@legacy41915546 (Space.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Proposal: Move to Jace== | ==Proposal: Move to Jace== | ||
Most references to Jace are Jace, not Jace Beleren. It seems needless that we should do the pipe trick simply because Jace Beleren is Jace's full name. --[[User:Magic Mage|<font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">agic</font> <font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">age</font>]] ([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|<font color="red">talk!</font>]]) 02:07, 2 September 2012 (EDT) | Most references to Jace are Jace, not Jace Beleren. It seems needless that we should do the pipe trick simply because Jace Beleren is Jace's full name. --[[User:Magic Mage|<font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">agic</font> <font color="dark"><b>M</b></font><font color="darkred">age</font>]] ([[User_talk:Magic_Mage|<font color="red">talk!</font>]]) 02:07, 2 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
:I severely disagree. Whenever possible, you should always address a character page by the character's full name.[[User:Barinellos|Barinellos]] ([[User talk:Barinellos|talk]]) 06:54, 2 September 2012 (EDT) | :I severely disagree. Whenever possible, you should always address a character page by the character's full name. [[User:Barinellos|Barinellos]] ([[User talk:Barinellos|talk]]) 06:54, 2 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
::Shall we use the character's full name for all references then? :S | ::Shall we use the character's full name for all references then? :S | ||
Revision as of 12:32, 2 September 2012
Picture gallery
Since the article is relatively short, and there's too many Jace arts that we could put here, including his cameos and other promo cards, so maybe we should add a picture gallery section.--Japoniano 16:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposal: Move to Jace
Most references to Jace are Jace, not Jace Beleren. It seems needless that we should do the pipe trick simply because Jace Beleren is Jace's full name. --Magic Mage (talk!) 02:07, 2 September 2012 (EDT)
- I severely disagree. Whenever possible, you should always address a character page by the character's full name. Barinellos (talk) 06:54, 2 September 2012 (EDT)
- Shall we use the character's full name for all references then? :S
- You do agree that we don't have epithets in the title, though, right? I've been removing epithets from the title (but not from the first line of the article).
- I suppose we can continue to do the pipe trick, as we could fix articles.
- Another thought; what about, for planeswalkers, who are known by their type, to use that type and to have their full name as the very first few words? :S Let us know. Thanks. --Magic Mage (talk!) 07:22, 2 September 2012 (EDT)